From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] dma-fence: export dma_fence_might_wait
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 11:14:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YOQe2fdqTzqyyV9L@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210706090559.1589544-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 10:05:58AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> It might be useful for drivers to annotate a path where hitting the
> actual wait path might be difficult or unlikely through normal testing.
>
> Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/dma-fence.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> index ce0f5eff575d..f2cd036b5243 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,21 @@ void __dma_fence_might_wait(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> +/**
> + * dma_fence_might_wait - entering a section which might wait on DMA fence
> + * critical section.
> + *
> + * This is also potentially useful for drivers to call directly, when annotating
> + * a path where hitting the actual wait path might be difficult or unlikely
> + * through normal testing.
Maybe also add a
"See also dma_fence_begin_signalling() and dma_fence_end_signalling."
here and a similar note the these two functions pointing at
dma_fence_might_wait()? I do like to link things together when there's a
group of functions.
With that: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> + */
> +void dma_fence_might_wait(void)
> +{
> + might_sleep();
> + __dma_fence_might_wait();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_might_wait);
> +
>
> /**
> * dma_fence_signal_timestamp_locked - signal completion of a fence
> @@ -495,9 +510,7 @@ dma_fence_wait_timeout(struct dma_fence *fence, bool intr, signed long timeout)
> if (WARN_ON(timeout < 0))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - might_sleep();
> -
> - __dma_fence_might_wait();
> + dma_fence_might_wait();
>
> trace_dma_fence_wait_start(fence);
> if (fence->ops->wait)
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> index 6ffb4b2c6371..37bf4beed93f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> @@ -370,6 +370,8 @@ static inline void dma_fence_end_signalling(bool cookie) {}
> static inline void __dma_fence_might_wait(void) {}
> #endif
>
> +void dma_fence_might_wait(void);
> +
> int dma_fence_signal(struct dma_fence *fence);
> int dma_fence_signal_locked(struct dma_fence *fence);
> int dma_fence_signal_timestamp(struct dma_fence *fence, ktime_t timestamp);
> --
> 2.26.3
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-06 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-06 9:05 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] dma-fence: export dma_fence_might_wait Matthew Auld
2021-07-06 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: prefer dma_fence_might_wait in wait_migration Matthew Auld
2021-07-06 9:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-06 9:14 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2021-07-06 9:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] dma-fence: export dma_fence_might_wait Daniel Vetter
2021-07-06 9:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
2021-07-06 10:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-06 14:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/2] dma-fence: export dma_fence_might_wait (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-06 14:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-06 15:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YOQe2fdqTzqyyV9L@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox