public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/i915: use consistent CPU mappings for pin_map users
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 13:46:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YOWUCZy354RR53i0@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210705135310.1502437-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>

On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 02:53:06PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> For discrete, users of pin_map() needs to obey the same rules at the TTM
> backend, where we map system only objects as WB, and everything else as
> WC. The simplest for now is to just force the correct mapping type as
> per the new rules for discrete.
> 
> Suggested-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>

Huge thanks for doing all the kerneldoc work for uapi you're doing in this
series, this should help a lot with umd conversions since we can just
point them at the docs and tell them to pls update code.

Yes I know there's no kerneldoc here, but I didn't see the cover letter
:-)

Cheers, Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h |  4 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c  | 22 ++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
> index 547cc9dad90d..9da7b288b7ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
> @@ -625,6 +625,40 @@ int i915_gem_object_migrate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>  	return obj->ops->migrate(obj, mr);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * i915_gem_object_placement_possible - Check whether the object can be
> + * placed at certain memory type
> + * @obj: Pointer to the object
> + * @type: The memory type to check
> + *
> + * Return: True if the object can be placed in @type. False otherwise.
> + */
> +bool i915_gem_object_placement_possible(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> +					enum intel_memory_type type)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	if (!obj->mm.n_placements) {
> +		switch (type) {
> +		case INTEL_MEMORY_LOCAL:
> +			return i915_gem_object_has_iomem(obj);
> +		case INTEL_MEMORY_SYSTEM:
> +			return i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj);
> +		default:
> +			/* Ignore stolen for now */
> +			GEM_BUG_ON(1);
> +			return false;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < obj->mm.n_placements; i++) {
> +		if (obj->mm.placements[i]->type == type)
> +			return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  void i915_gem_init__objects(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  {
>  	INIT_WORK(&i915->mm.free_work, __i915_gem_free_work);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
> index d423d8cac4f2..8be4fadeee48 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <drm/drm_device.h>
>  
>  #include "display/intel_frontbuffer.h"
> +#include "intel_memory_region.h"
>  #include "i915_gem_object_types.h"
>  #include "i915_gem_gtt.h"
>  #include "i915_gem_ww.h"
> @@ -607,6 +608,9 @@ bool i915_gem_object_can_migrate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>  int i915_gem_object_wait_migration(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>  				   unsigned int flags);
>  
> +bool i915_gem_object_placement_possible(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> +					enum intel_memory_type type);
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
>  static inline bool
>  i915_gem_object_is_userptr(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> index f2f850e31b8e..810a157a18f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> @@ -321,8 +321,7 @@ static void *i915_gem_object_map_pfn(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>  	dma_addr_t addr;
>  	void *vaddr;
>  
> -	if (type != I915_MAP_WC)
> -		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(type != I915_MAP_WC);
>  
>  	if (n_pfn > ARRAY_SIZE(stack)) {
>  		/* Too big for stack -- allocate temporary array instead */
> @@ -374,6 +373,25 @@ void *i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>  	}
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj));
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * For discrete our CPU mappings needs to be consistent in order to
> +	 * function correctly on !x86. When mapping things through TTM, we use
> +	 * the same rules to determine the caching type.
> +	 *
> +	 * Internal users of lmem are already expected to get this right, so no
> +	 * fudging needed there.
> +	 */
> +	if (i915_gem_object_placement_possible(obj, INTEL_MEMORY_LOCAL)) {
> +		if (type != I915_MAP_WC && !obj->mm.n_placements) {
> +			ptr = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +			goto err_unpin;
> +		}
> +
> +		type = I915_MAP_WC;
> +	} else if (IS_DGFX(to_i915(obj->base.dev))) {
> +		type = I915_MAP_WB;
> +	}
> +
>  	ptr = page_unpack_bits(obj->mm.mapping, &has_type);
>  	if (ptr && has_type != type) {
>  		if (pinned) {
> -- 
> 2.26.3
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-07 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-05 13:53 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/i915: use consistent CPU mappings for pin_map users Matthew Auld
2021-07-05 13:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/i915/uapi: convert drm_i915_gem_caching to kernel doc Matthew Auld
2021-07-07  0:29   ` Ramalingam C
2021-07-05 13:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/i915/uapi: reject caching ioctls for discrete Matthew Auld
2021-07-07  0:38   ` Ramalingam C
2021-07-13 18:03   ` Kenneth Graunke
2021-07-05 13:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/i915/uapi: convert drm_i915_gem_set_domain to kernel doc Matthew Auld
2021-07-07  0:41   ` Ramalingam C
2021-07-05 13:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915/uapi: reject set_domain for discrete Matthew Auld
2021-07-07  0:49   ` Ramalingam C
2021-07-05 15:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v3,1/5] drm/i915: use consistent CPU mappings for pin_map users Patchwork
2021-07-05 15:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-07  0:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/5] " Ramalingam C
2021-07-07 11:46 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YOWUCZy354RR53i0@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox