public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/30] drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:22:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YP6NA8YnP3eMEMXm@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210724001114.249295-25-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 05:11:08PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> With the removal of CNL, let's consider ICL as the first platform using
> those constants.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h   | 24 +++++++++++------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 32 +++++++++++++++----------------
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index f032a4c8b26d..8782d1723254 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -11082,18 +11082,18 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>  #define  SKL_DRAM_RANK_1			(0x0 << 10)
>  #define  SKL_DRAM_RANK_2			(0x1 << 10)
>  #define  SKL_DRAM_RANK_MASK			(0x1 << 10)
> -#define  CNL_DRAM_SIZE_MASK			0x7F
> -#define  CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK			(0x3 << 7)
> -#define  CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT			7
> -#define  CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8			(0x0 << 7)
> -#define  CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16			(0x1 << 7)
> -#define  CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X32			(0x2 << 7)
> -#define  CNL_DRAM_RANK_MASK			(0x3 << 9)
> -#define  CNL_DRAM_RANK_SHIFT			9
> -#define  CNL_DRAM_RANK_1			(0x0 << 9)
> -#define  CNL_DRAM_RANK_2			(0x1 << 9)
> -#define  CNL_DRAM_RANK_3			(0x2 << 9)
> -#define  CNL_DRAM_RANK_4			(0x3 << 9)
> +#define  ICL_DRAM_SIZE_MASK			0x7F
> +#define  ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK			(0x3 << 7)
> +#define  ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT			7
> +#define  ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8			(0x0 << 7)
> +#define  ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16			(0x1 << 7)
> +#define  ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X32			(0x2 << 7)
> +#define  ICL_DRAM_RANK_MASK			(0x3 << 9)
> +#define  ICL_DRAM_RANK_SHIFT			9
> +#define  ICL_DRAM_RANK_1			(0x0 << 9)
> +#define  ICL_DRAM_RANK_2			(0x1 << 9)
> +#define  ICL_DRAM_RANK_3			(0x2 << 9)
> +#define  ICL_DRAM_RANK_4			(0x3 << 9)
>  
>  #define SA_PERF_STATUS_0_0_0_MCHBAR_PC		_MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5918)
>  #define  DG1_QCLK_RATIO_MASK			REG_GENMASK(9, 2)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
> index 9675bb94b70b..34d6cf440352 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
> @@ -77,21 +77,21 @@ static int skl_get_dimm_ranks(u16 val)
>  }
>  
>  /* Returns total Gb for the whole DIMM */
> -static int cnl_get_dimm_size(u16 val)
> +static int icl_get_dimm_size(u16 val)
>  {
> -	return (val & CNL_DRAM_SIZE_MASK) * 8 / 2;
> +	return (val & ICL_DRAM_SIZE_MASK) * 8 / 2;
>  }
>  
> -static int cnl_get_dimm_width(u16 val)
> +static int icl_get_dimm_width(u16 val)
>  {
> -	if (cnl_get_dimm_size(val) == 0)
> +	if (icl_get_dimm_size(val) == 0)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	switch (val & CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) {
> -	case CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8:
> -	case CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16:
> -	case CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X32:
> -		val = (val & CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) >> CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT;
> +	switch (val & ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) {
> +	case ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8:
> +	case ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16:
> +	case ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X32:
> +		val = (val & ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) >> ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT;
>  		return 8 << val;
>  	default:
>  		MISSING_CASE(val);
> @@ -99,12 +99,12 @@ static int cnl_get_dimm_width(u16 val)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static int cnl_get_dimm_ranks(u16 val)
> +static int icl_get_dimm_ranks(u16 val)
>  {
> -	if (cnl_get_dimm_size(val) == 0)
> +	if (icl_get_dimm_size(val) == 0)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	val = (val & CNL_DRAM_RANK_MASK) >> CNL_DRAM_RANK_SHIFT;
> +	val = (val & ICL_DRAM_RANK_MASK) >> ICL_DRAM_RANK_SHIFT;
>  
>  	return val + 1;
>  }
> @@ -121,10 +121,10 @@ skl_dram_get_dimm_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  		       struct dram_dimm_info *dimm,
>  		       int channel, char dimm_name, u16 val)
>  {
> -	if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 10) {
> -		dimm->size = cnl_get_dimm_size(val);
> -		dimm->width = cnl_get_dimm_width(val);
> -		dimm->ranks = cnl_get_dimm_ranks(val);
> +	if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 11) {
> +		dimm->size = icl_get_dimm_size(val);
> +		dimm->width = icl_get_dimm_width(val);
> +		dimm->ranks = icl_get_dimm_ranks(val);
>  	} else {
>  		dimm->size = skl_get_dimm_size(val);
>  		dimm->width = skl_get_dimm_width(val);
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-26 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-24  0:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/30] Remove CNL support Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/30] drm/i915: fix not reading DSC disable fuse in GLK Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 18:03   ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/30] drm/i915/display: split DISPLAY_VER 9 and 10 in intel_setup_outputs() Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 17:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-25  5:02     ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:20       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-26 14:01         ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/30] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 18:05   ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 18:12   ` Matt Roper
2021-07-27  6:12     ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 18:14   ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 18:17   ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24 18:17   ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 11:00   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 11:06   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 11:06   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-26 23:21   ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:41   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:35   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 11:05   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:22   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/30] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:28   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/30] drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:56   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/30] drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:11   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/30] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:59   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-26 15:06     ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/30] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 11:08   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/30] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_mocs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:21   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/30] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:14   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/30] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:57   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/30] drm/i915/gt: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_sseu.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 23:21   ` Matt Roper
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/30] drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:22   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/30] drm/i915/gt: rename CNL references in intel_engine.h Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:38   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/30] drm/i915: finish removal of CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:21   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/30] drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10 Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:08   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/30] drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:06   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/30] drm/i915: replace random CNL comments Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-24  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/30] drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-26 10:13   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-27  6:59     ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-24  0:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Remove CNL support Patchwork
2021-07-24  0:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-24  1:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-24  2:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/30] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-24 12:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
2021-07-26 11:07   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-07-26 13:59     ` Lucas De Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YP6NA8YnP3eMEMXm@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox