From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] fbdev/efifb: Release PCI device's runtime PM ref during FB destroy
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 00:23:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQsTWSGIgY00XEU7@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210802133551.1904964-1-imre.deak@intel.com>
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 04:35:51PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> Atm the EFI FB driver gets a runtime PM reference for the associated GFX
> PCI device during driver probing and releases it only when removing the
> driver.
>
> When fbcon switches to the FB provided by the PCI device's driver (for
> instance i915/drmfb), the EFI FB will get only unregistered without the
> EFI FB driver getting unloaded, keeping the runtime PM reference
> acquired during driver probing. This reference will prevent the PCI
> driver from runtime suspending the device.
>
> Fix this by releasing the RPM reference from the EFI FB's destroy hook,
> called when the FB gets unregistered.
>
> Fixes: a6c0fd3d5a8b ("efifb: Ensure graphics device for efifb stays at PCI D0")
> Cc: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Patch looks good:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
But I've found a bunch of ordering issues here:
- we should probably get the runtime pm reference _before_ we register the
framebuffer. There's a race right now about there.
- the sysfs_remove_groups and framebuffer_release should also be moved
into the destroy callback. This is more a leak type of situation.
Cheers, Daniel
> ---
> drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
> index 8ea8f079cde26..25cdea32b9633 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ static bool use_bgrt = true;
> static bool request_mem_succeeded = false;
> static u64 mem_flags = EFI_MEMORY_WC | EFI_MEMORY_UC;
>
> +static struct pci_dev *efifb_pci_dev; /* dev with BAR covering the efifb */
> +
> static struct fb_var_screeninfo efifb_defined = {
> .activate = FB_ACTIVATE_NOW,
> .height = -1,
> @@ -243,6 +245,9 @@ static inline void efifb_show_boot_graphics(struct fb_info *info) {}
>
> static void efifb_destroy(struct fb_info *info)
> {
> + if (efifb_pci_dev)
> + pm_runtime_put(&efifb_pci_dev->dev);
> +
> if (info->screen_base) {
> if (mem_flags & (EFI_MEMORY_UC | EFI_MEMORY_WC))
> iounmap(info->screen_base);
> @@ -333,7 +338,6 @@ ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(efifb);
>
> static bool pci_dev_disabled; /* FB base matches BAR of a disabled device */
>
> -static struct pci_dev *efifb_pci_dev; /* dev with BAR covering the efifb */
> static struct resource *bar_resource;
> static u64 bar_offset;
>
> @@ -603,8 +607,6 @@ static int efifb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> unregister_framebuffer(info);
> sysfs_remove_groups(&pdev->dev.kobj, efifb_groups);
> framebuffer_release(info);
> - if (efifb_pci_dev)
> - pm_runtime_put(&efifb_pci_dev->dev);
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.27.0
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-04 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-02 13:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] fbdev/efifb: Release PCI device's runtime PM ref during FB destroy Imre Deak
2021-08-02 15:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-08-03 0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-08-04 22:23 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2021-08-07 15:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Imre Deak
2021-08-09 14:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 13:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Imre Deak
2021-08-10 8:36 ` Imre Deak
2021-08-10 14:48 ` Alex Deucher
2021-08-10 15:20 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2021-08-13 13:46 ` Imre Deak
2021-08-09 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for fbdev/efifb: Release PCI device's runtime PM ref during FB destroy (rev2) Patchwork
2021-08-09 15:12 ` Imre Deak
2021-08-09 16:37 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2021-08-09 16:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-08-09 17:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-08-09 17:57 ` Imre Deak
2021-08-09 18:32 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2021-08-09 18:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQsTWSGIgY00XEU7@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox