From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/selftests: Fix memory corruption in live_lrc_isolation
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:33:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRJWD4pI5mW+gyoR@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210809193739.GA124301@DUT151-ICLU.fm.intel.com>
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 07:37:39PM +0000, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 03:38:38PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 11:07:56AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > GuC submission has exposed an existing memory corruption in
> > > live_lrc_isolation. We believe that some writes to the watchdog offsets
> > > in the LRC (0x178 & 0x17c) can result in trashing of portions of the
> > > address space. With GuC submission there are additional objects which
> > > can move the context redzone into the space that is trashed. To
> > > workaround this avoid poisoning the watchdog.
> >
> > A Bspec reference here would be good (we can quote anything that's marked
> > for public release, so doesn't have one of the IP markers).
> >
>
> Let me see what I dig up in the bspec.
>
> BTW - Hopefully we can root cause this soon with a proper fix.
Well if it's work-in-progress duct-tape without reference that's fine
too, then perhaps sprinkle a JIRA number here (just not the full link,
intel IT doesn't like those leaking). Just something that in a few months
when someone reads that code they can stitch together the story again.
-Daniel
>
> > Also I think the above should be replicated in condensed form instead of
> > the XXX comment.
> >
>
> Sure.
>
> Matt
>
> > With those: Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> since I
> > definitely have enough clue here for a detailed review.
> > -Daniel
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> > > index b0977a3b699b..6500e9fce8a0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> > > @@ -1074,6 +1074,32 @@ record_registers(struct intel_context *ce,
> > > goto err_after;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static u32 safe_offset(u32 offset, u32 reg)
> > > +{
> > > + /* XXX skip testing of watchdog */
> > > + if (offset == 0x178 || offset == 0x17c)
> > > + reg = 0;
> > > +
> > > + return reg;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int get_offset_mask(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > > +{
> > > + if (GRAPHICS_VER(engine->i915) < 12)
> > > + return 0xfff;
> > > +
> > > + switch (engine->class) {
> > > + default:
> > > + case RENDER_CLASS:
> > > + return 0x07ff;
> > > + case COPY_ENGINE_CLASS:
> > > + return 0x0fff;
> > > + case VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS:
> > > + case VIDEO_ENHANCEMENT_CLASS:
> > > + return 0x3fff;
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static struct i915_vma *load_context(struct intel_context *ce, u32 poison)
> > > {
> > > struct i915_vma *batch;
> > > @@ -1117,7 +1143,8 @@ static struct i915_vma *load_context(struct intel_context *ce, u32 poison)
> > > len = (len + 1) / 2;
> > > *cs++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(len);
> > > while (len--) {
> > > - *cs++ = hw[dw];
> > > + *cs++ = safe_offset(hw[dw] & get_offset_mask(ce->engine),
> > > + hw[dw]);
> > > *cs++ = poison;
> > > dw += 2;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.28.0
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-10 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-08 18:07 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Clean up some CI failures for GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-08-08 17:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2021-08-08 18:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Fix several issues related to resets / request cancelation Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 13:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:35 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10 10:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-08 18:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/selftests: Fix memory corruption in live_lrc_isolation Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 13:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:37 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10 10:33 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2021-08-08 18:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost G2H Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 14:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:41 ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10 10:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-08 18:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Clean up some CI failures for GuC submission Patchwork
2021-08-08 19:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRJWD4pI5mW+gyoR@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox