Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.com>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@outlook.com>,
	Mark Pearson <markpearson@lenovo.com>,
	Sebastien Bacher <seb128@ubuntu.com>,
	Marco Trevisan <marco.trevisan@canonical.com>,
	Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Add privacy-screen support
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 16:45:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUNKh9xcIGoi1eol@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210906073519.4615-10-hdegoede@redhat.com>

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 09:35:19AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Add support for eDP panels with a built-in privacy screen using the
> new drm_privacy_screen class.
> 
> One thing which stands out here is the addition of these 2 lines to
> intel_atomic_commit_tail:
> 
> 	for_each_new_connector_in_state(&state->base, connector, ...
> 		drm_connector_update_privacy_screen(connector, state);
> 
> It may seem more logical to instead take care of updating the
> privacy-screen state by marking the crtc as needing a modeset and then
> do this in both the encoder update_pipe (for fast-sets) and enable
> (for full modesets) callbacks. But ATM these callbacks only get passed
> the new connector_state and these callbacks are all called after
> drm_atomic_helper_swap_state() at which point there is no way to get
> the old state from the new state.

Pretty sure the full atomic state is plumbed all the way
down these days.

> 
> Without access to the old state, we do not know if the sw_state of
> the privacy-screen has changes so we would need to call
> drm_privacy_screen_set_sw_state() unconditionally. This is undesirable
> since all current known privacy-screen providers use ACPI calls which
> are somewhat expensive to make.

I doubt anyone is going to care about a bit of overhead for a modeset.
The usual rule is that a modeset doesn't skip anything. That way we
can be 100% sure we remeber to update everythinbg. For fastsets I guess
one could argue skipping it if not needed, but not sure even that is
warranted.

The current code you have in there is cettainly 110% dodgy. Since the
sw_state is stored in the connector state I presume it's at least
trying to be an atomic property, which means you shouldn't go poking
at it after the swap_state ever. swap_state just swaps the pointers
which is all that you need. So at least that part should get nuked.
The immutable hw_state I guess should get updated when we program the
actual hw.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-16 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-06  7:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] drm: Add privacy-screen class and connector properties Hans de Goede
2021-09-06  7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] drm/connector: Add support for privacy-screen properties (v4) Hans de Goede
2021-09-15 19:48   ` Lyude Paul
2021-09-16  8:26     ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-06  7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/9] drm: Add privacy-screen class (v3) Hans de Goede
2021-09-15 20:01   ` Lyude Paul
2021-09-16  8:49     ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-06  7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/privacy-screen: Add X86 specific arch init code Hans de Goede
2021-09-16  8:51   ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-16  9:18     ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-06  7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/privacy-screen: Add notifier support Hans de Goede
2021-09-15 20:26   ` Lyude Paul
2021-09-16  9:06     ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-16 16:50       ` Lyude Paul
2021-09-06  7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/connector: Add a drm_connector privacy-screen helper functions Hans de Goede
2021-09-06  7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add hotkey_notify_extended_hotkey() helper Hans de Goede
2021-09-06  7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/9] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Get privacy-screen / lcdshadow ACPI handles only once Hans de Goede
2021-09-06  7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Register a privacy-screen device Hans de Goede
2021-09-15 20:55   ` Lyude Paul
2021-09-16  9:09     ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-06  7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Add privacy-screen support Hans de Goede
2021-09-15 21:11   ` Lyude Paul
2021-09-16  9:12     ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-16  9:40   ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-16 10:32     ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-20 21:06       ` Lyude Paul
2021-09-16 14:04     ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-09-17 14:23       ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-16 13:45   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2021-09-17 14:37     ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-17 16:25       ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-09-17 16:42         ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-17 17:04           ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-09-06  8:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm: Add privacy-screen class and connector properties (rev4) Patchwork
2021-09-06  8:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-06  9:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-06 11:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-09-15 21:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] drm: Add privacy-screen class and connector properties Lyude Paul
2021-09-16  9:30   ` Hans de Goede
2021-09-16 10:14     ` Jani Nikula
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-07-08 16:43 Hans de Goede
2020-07-08 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Add privacy-screen support Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YUNKh9xcIGoi1eol@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=marco.trevisan@canonical.com \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@outlook.com \
    --cc=markpearson@lenovo.com \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=pekka.paalanen@collabora.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rajatja@google.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=seb128@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox