Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: remove unneeded clflush calls

["Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:47:08PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:29:12PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
> >On 9/15/2021 12:24, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
> >>On 9/14/2021 12:51 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >>>The clflush calls here aren't doing anything since we are not writting
> >>>something and flushing the cache lines to be visible to GuC. Here the
> >>>intention seems to be to make sure whatever GuC has written is visible
> >>>to the CPU before we read them. However a clflush from the CPU side is
> >>>the wrong instruction to use.
> >Is there a right instruction to use? Either we need to verify that no 
> 
> how can there be a right instruction? If the GuC needs to flush, then
> the GuC needs to do it, nothing to be done by the CPU.
> 
> Flushing the CPU cache line here is doing nothing to guarantee that what
> was written by GuC hit the memory and we are reading it. Not sure why it
> was actually added, but since it was added by Vinay and he reviewed this
> patch, I'm assuming he also agrees

clflush == writeback + invalidate. The invalidate is the important part
when the CPU has to read something written by something else that's not
cache coherent.

Now, I have no idea if the guc has its own (CPU invisible) caches or not.
If it does then it will need to trigger a writeback. But regardless, if
the guc bypasses the CPU caches the CPU will need to invalidate before
it reads anything in case it has stale data sitting in its cache.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel