From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't disable interrupts and pretend a lock as been acquired in __timeline_mark_lock().
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 17:04:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZfK8LDcGzQEchel@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211118165914.pckik75emivsilek@linutronix.de>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 05:59:14PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This is a revert of commits
> d67739268cf0e ("drm/i915/gt: Mark up the nested engine-pm timeline lock as irqsafe")
> 6c69a45445af9 ("drm/i915/gt: Mark context->active_count as protected by timeline->mutex")
>
> The existing code leads to a different behaviour depending on whether
> lockdep is enabled or not. Any following lock that is acquired without
> disabling interrupts (but needs to) will not be noticed by lockdep.
>
> This it not just a lockdep annotation but is used but an actual mutex_t
> that is properly used as a lock but in case of __timeline_mark_lock()
> lockdep is only told that it is acquired but no lock has been acquired.
>
> It appears that its purpose is just satisfy the lockdep_assert_held()
> check in intel_context_mark_active(). The other problem with disabling
> interrupts is that on PREEMPT_RT interrupts are also disabled which
> leads to problems for instance later during memory allocation.
>
> Add a CONTEXT_IS_PARKED bit to intel_engine_cs and set_bit/clear_bit it
> instead of mutex_acquire/mutex_release. Use test_bit in the two
> identified spots which relied on the lockdep annotation.
>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Yeah if we can simplify this with reverts then I'm all for this.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I've asked drm/i915 maintainers to check&merge.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h | 1
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c | 38 +-------------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h | 3 +-
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
> @@ -211,7 +211,8 @@ static inline void intel_context_enter(s
>
> static inline void intel_context_mark_active(struct intel_context *ce)
> {
> - lockdep_assert_held(&ce->timeline->mutex);
> + lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(&ce->timeline->mutex) ||
> + test_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKED, &ce->flags));
> ++ce->active_count;
> }
>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ struct intel_context {
> #define CONTEXT_LRCA_DIRTY 9
> #define CONTEXT_GUC_INIT 10
> #define CONTEXT_PERMA_PIN 11
> +#define CONTEXT_IS_PARKED 12
>
> struct {
> u64 timeout_us;
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> @@ -80,39 +80,6 @@ static int __engine_unpark(struct intel_
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)
> -
> -static unsigned long __timeline_mark_lock(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> - mutex_acquire(&ce->timeline->mutex.dep_map, 2, 0, _THIS_IP_);
> -
> - return flags;
> -}
> -
> -static void __timeline_mark_unlock(struct intel_context *ce,
> - unsigned long flags)
> -{
> - mutex_release(&ce->timeline->mutex.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> -}
> -
> -#else
> -
> -static unsigned long __timeline_mark_lock(struct intel_context *ce)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static void __timeline_mark_unlock(struct intel_context *ce,
> - unsigned long flags)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -#endif /* !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) */
> -
> static void duration(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
> {
> struct i915_request *rq = to_request(fence);
> @@ -159,7 +126,6 @@ static bool switch_to_kernel_context(str
> {
> struct intel_context *ce = engine->kernel_context;
> struct i915_request *rq;
> - unsigned long flags;
> bool result = true;
>
> /*
> @@ -214,7 +180,7 @@ static bool switch_to_kernel_context(str
> * engine->wakeref.count, we may see the request completion and retire
> * it causing an underflow of the engine->wakeref.
> */
> - flags = __timeline_mark_lock(ce);
> + set_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKED, &ce->flags);
> GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&ce->timeline->active_count) < 0);
>
> rq = __i915_request_create(ce, GFP_NOWAIT);
> @@ -246,7 +212,7 @@ static bool switch_to_kernel_context(str
>
> result = false;
> out_unlock:
> - __timeline_mark_unlock(ce, flags);
> + clear_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKED, &ce->flags);
> return result;
> }
>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
> @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ i915_request_timeline(const struct i915_
> {
> /* Valid only while the request is being constructed (or retired). */
> return rcu_dereference_protected(rq->timeline,
> - lockdep_is_held(&rcu_access_pointer(rq->timeline)->mutex));
> + lockdep_is_held(&rcu_access_pointer(rq->timeline)->mutex) ||
> + test_bit(CONTEXT_IS_PARKED, &rq->context->flags));
> }
>
> static inline struct i915_gem_context *
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-19 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-18 16:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't disable interrupts and pretend a lock as been acquired in __timeline_mark_lock() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-11-18 17:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2021-11-18 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-11-18 17:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-11-19 8:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-11-19 14:58 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-11-19 16:04 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2021-11-30 16:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-07 18:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-12-08 9:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-12-10 20:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-13 9:25 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-12-10 21:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Don't disable interrupts and pretend a lock as been acquired in __timeline_mark_lock(). (rev2) Patchwork
2021-12-10 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-12-10 22:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-12-11 20:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YZfK8LDcGzQEchel@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox