From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2] drm/i915/gt: Use hw_engine_masks as reset_domains
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 10:51:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ya+C8qlQt+N9y+KZ@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211206081026.4024401-1-tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 01:40:26PM +0530, Tejas Upadhyay wrote:
> We need a way to reset engines by their reset domains.
> This change sets up way to fetch reset domains of each
> engine globally.
>
> Changes since V1:
> - Use static reset domain array - Ville and Tvrtko
> - Use BUG_ON at appropriate place - Tvrtko
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c | 29 ++----------------
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> index f2ccd5b53d42..352254e001b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -325,6 +325,38 @@ static int intel_engine_setup(struct intel_gt *gt, enum intel_engine_id id,
> engine->id = id;
> engine->legacy_idx = INVALID_ENGINE;
> engine->mask = BIT(id);
> + if (GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915) >= 11) {
> + static const u32 engine_reset_domains[] = {
> + [RCS0] = GEN11_GRDOM_RENDER,
> + [BCS0] = GEN11_GRDOM_BLT,
> + [VCS0] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA,
> + [VCS1] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA2,
> + [VCS2] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA3,
> + [VCS3] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA4,
> + [VCS4] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA5,
> + [VCS5] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA6,
> + [VCS6] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA7,
> + [VCS7] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA8,
> + [VECS0] = GEN11_GRDOM_VECS,
> + [VECS1] = GEN11_GRDOM_VECS2,
> + [VECS2] = GEN11_GRDOM_VECS3,
> + [VECS3] = GEN11_GRDOM_VECS4,
> + };
> + GEM_BUG_ON(id >= ARRAY_SIZE(engine_reset_domains) ||
> + !engine_reset_domains[id]);
I was worried about this new addition to the check, but apparently
it works because no Reset domain is == 0....
Well, not sure if we won't have any in the future, but you
are right, probably better to protect the current cases than
wonder about a theoretical future one.
> + engine->reset_domain = engine_reset_domains[id];
> + } else {
> + static const u32 engine_reset_domains[] = {
> + [RCS0] = GEN6_GRDOM_RENDER,
> + [BCS0] = GEN6_GRDOM_BLT,
> + [VCS0] = GEN6_GRDOM_MEDIA,
> + [VCS1] = GEN8_GRDOM_MEDIA2,
> + [VECS0] = GEN6_GRDOM_VECS,
> + };
> + GEM_BUG_ON(id >= ARRAY_SIZE(engine_reset_domains) ||
> + !engine_reset_domains[id]);
> + engine->reset_domain = engine_reset_domains[id];
> + }
probably better if we could have a function for this.
engine->reset_domain = intel_reset_domain()... or something like that...
but not blocker... the patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> engine->i915 = i915;
> engine->gt = gt;
> engine->uncore = gt->uncore;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
> index 5732e0d71513..36365bdbe1ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
> unsigned int guc_id;
>
> intel_engine_mask_t mask;
> + u32 reset_domain;
> /**
> * @logical_mask: logical mask of engine, reported to user space via
> * query IOCTL and used to communicate with the GuC in logical space.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> index 0fbd6dbadce7..63199f0550e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> @@ -297,13 +297,6 @@ static int gen6_reset_engines(struct intel_gt *gt,
> intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask,
> unsigned int retry)
> {
> - static const u32 hw_engine_mask[] = {
> - [RCS0] = GEN6_GRDOM_RENDER,
> - [BCS0] = GEN6_GRDOM_BLT,
> - [VCS0] = GEN6_GRDOM_MEDIA,
> - [VCS1] = GEN8_GRDOM_MEDIA2,
> - [VECS0] = GEN6_GRDOM_VECS,
> - };
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> u32 hw_mask;
>
> @@ -314,8 +307,7 @@ static int gen6_reset_engines(struct intel_gt *gt,
>
> hw_mask = 0;
> for_each_engine_masked(engine, gt, engine_mask, tmp) {
> - GEM_BUG_ON(engine->id >= ARRAY_SIZE(hw_engine_mask));
> - hw_mask |= hw_engine_mask[engine->id];
> + hw_mask |= engine->reset_domain;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -492,22 +484,6 @@ static int gen11_reset_engines(struct intel_gt *gt,
> intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask,
> unsigned int retry)
> {
> - static const u32 hw_engine_mask[] = {
> - [RCS0] = GEN11_GRDOM_RENDER,
> - [BCS0] = GEN11_GRDOM_BLT,
> - [VCS0] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA,
> - [VCS1] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA2,
> - [VCS2] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA3,
> - [VCS3] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA4,
> - [VCS4] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA5,
> - [VCS5] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA6,
> - [VCS6] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA7,
> - [VCS7] = GEN11_GRDOM_MEDIA8,
> - [VECS0] = GEN11_GRDOM_VECS,
> - [VECS1] = GEN11_GRDOM_VECS2,
> - [VECS2] = GEN11_GRDOM_VECS3,
> - [VECS3] = GEN11_GRDOM_VECS4,
> - };
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> intel_engine_mask_t tmp;
> u32 reset_mask, unlock_mask = 0;
> @@ -518,8 +494,7 @@ static int gen11_reset_engines(struct intel_gt *gt,
> } else {
> reset_mask = 0;
> for_each_engine_masked(engine, gt, engine_mask, tmp) {
> - GEM_BUG_ON(engine->id >= ARRAY_SIZE(hw_engine_mask));
> - reset_mask |= hw_engine_mask[engine->id];
> + reset_mask |= engine->reset_domain;
> ret = gen11_lock_sfc(engine, &reset_mask, &unlock_mask);
> if (ret)
> goto sfc_unlock;
> --
> 2.31.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-06 8:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2] drm/i915/gt: Use hw_engine_masks as reset_domains Tejas Upadhyay
2021-12-06 12:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/gt: Use hw_engine_masks as reset_domains (rev2) Patchwork
2021-12-06 13:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-12-06 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-12-07 15:51 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ya+C8qlQt+N9y+KZ@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox