From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add DSC support to MST path
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 18:52:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjNnTGO3AQE5lPRL@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220317163353.4152-3-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 06:33:53PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> Whenever we are not able to get enough timeslots
> for required PBN, let's try to allocate those
> using DSC, just same way as we do for SST.
>
> Those patches are experimental yet, i.e not
> for merging, still need to be tested with
> proper DSC display, submitting those to check
> ig nothing else blows up at least.
>
> v2: Add DSC checks to intel_dp_mst_mode_valid_ctx, similar
> to ones we have in intel_dp_mode_valid(Manasi Navare)
>
> v3: Removed redundant edp condition logic from MST DSC
> handling(Manasi Navare)
>
> v4: - Fixed forgotten force_dsc_en condition which was
> always enabled for testing purposes(Manasi Navare)
> - Properly process ret == EDEADLK, thus fixing the
> regression caused by WARN triggered with modeset_lock.
>
> v5: - Removed redundant check(Imre Deak)
>
> Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 17 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 285 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 9e19165fd175..b04771e495cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ bool intel_dp_is_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> }
>
> static void intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 dsc_max_bpc);
>
> /* Is link rate UHBR and thus 128b/132b? */
> bool intel_dp_is_uhbr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> @@ -667,11 +666,12 @@ small_joiner_ram_size_bits(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> return 6144 * 8;
> }
>
> -static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> - u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
> - u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay,
> - bool bigjoiner,
> - u32 pipe_bpp)
> +u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
> + u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay,
> + bool bigjoiner,
> + u32 pipe_bpp,
> + u32 timeslots)
> {
> u32 bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram;
> int i;
> @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> * for MST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP has to be calculated
> */
> bits_per_pixel = (link_clock * lane_count * 8) /
> - intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
> + (intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock) * timeslots);
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Max link bpp: %u\n", bits_per_pixel);
>
> /* Small Joiner Check: output bpp <= joiner RAM (bits) / Horiz. width */
> @@ -737,9 +737,9 @@ static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> return bits_per_pixel << 4;
> }
>
> -static u8 intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> - int mode_clock, int mode_hdisplay,
> - bool bigjoiner)
> +u8 intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + int mode_clock, int mode_hdisplay,
> + bool bigjoiner)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> u8 min_slice_count, i;
> @@ -902,8 +902,8 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid_downstream(struct intel_connector *connector,
> return MODE_OK;
> }
>
> -static bool intel_dp_need_bigjoiner(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> - int hdisplay, int clock)
> +bool intel_dp_need_bigjoiner(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + int hdisplay, int clock)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>
> @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> target_clock,
> mode->hdisplay,
> bigjoiner,
> - pipe_bpp) >> 4;
> + pipe_bpp, 1) >> 4;
> dsc_slice_count =
> intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
> target_clock,
> @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> -static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 max_req_bpc)
> +int intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 max_req_bpc)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> int i, num_bpc;
> @@ -1429,7 +1429,8 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes,
> - pipe_bpp);
> + pipe_bpp,
> + 1);
> dsc_dp_slice_count =
> intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
> adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> @@ -1444,7 +1445,114 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> dsc_max_output_bpp >> 4,
> pipe_config->pipe_bpp);
> pipe_config->dsc.slice_count = dsc_dp_slice_count;
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "DSC: compressed bpp %d slice count %d\n",
> + pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp,
> + pipe_config->dsc.slice_count);
> }
> + /*
> + * VDSC engine operates at 1 Pixel per clock, so if peak pixel rate
> + * is greater than the maximum Cdclock and if slice count is even
> + * then we need to use 2 VDSC instances.
> + */
> + if (adjusted_mode->crtc_clock > dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq) {
> + if (pipe_config->dsc.slice_count > 1) {
> + pipe_config->dsc.dsc_split = true;
> + } else {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "Cannot split stream to use 2 VDSC instances\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ret = intel_dp_dsc_compute_params(&dig_port->base, pipe_config);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "Cannot compute valid DSC parameters for Input Bpp = %d "
> + "Compressed BPP = %d\n",
> + pipe_config->pipe_bpp,
> + pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + pipe_config->dsc.compression_enable = true;
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "DP DSC computed with Input Bpp = %d "
> + "Compressed Bpp = %d Slice Count = %d\n",
> + pipe_config->pipe_bpp,
> + pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp,
> + pipe_config->dsc.slice_count);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int intel_dp_mst_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> + struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> + struct link_config_limits *limits,
> + int timeslots)
> +{
> + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> + &pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode;
> + int pipe_bpp;
> + int ret;
> + u16 dsc_max_output_bpp;
> + u8 dsc_dp_slice_count;
> +
> + pipe_config->fec_enable = !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
> + intel_dp_supports_fec(intel_dp, pipe_config);
> +
> + if (!intel_dp_supports_dsc(intel_dp, pipe_config))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(intel_dp, conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> +
> + /* Min Input BPC for ICL+ is 8 */
> + if (pipe_bpp < 8 * 3) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "No DSC support for less than 8bpc\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * For now enable DSC for max bpp, max link rate, max lane count.
> + * Optimize this later for the minimum possible link rate/lane count
> + * with DSC enabled for the requested mode.
> + */
> + pipe_config->pipe_bpp = pipe_bpp;
> + pipe_config->port_clock = limits->max_rate;
> + pipe_config->lane_count = limits->max_lane_count;
> +
> + dsc_max_output_bpp =
> + intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(dev_priv,
> + pipe_config->port_clock,
> + pipe_config->lane_count,
> + adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> + adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> + pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes,
> + pipe_bpp,
> + timeslots);
> +
> + dsc_dp_slice_count =
> + intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
> + adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> + adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> + pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes);
> +
> + if (!dsc_max_output_bpp || !dsc_dp_slice_count) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "Compressed BPP/Slice Count not supported\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp = min_t(u16,
> + dsc_max_output_bpp >> 4,
> + pipe_config->pipe_bpp);
> +
> + pipe_config->dsc.slice_count = dsc_dp_slice_count;
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "MST DSC: compressed bpp %d slice count %d\n",
> + pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp,
> + pipe_config->dsc.slice_count);
>
That looks like 100% copy-pasta from the existing function.
Please refactor if you can't just call the existing function
directly for some reason.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-17 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-17 16:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-17 16:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add missing DP DSC extended capability definitions Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-17 16:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add DSC support to MST path Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-17 16:52 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-03-18 10:50 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-03-17 17:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Patchwork
2022-03-17 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-17 17:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-17 19:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-21 9:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-21 9:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add DSC support to MST path Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-21 11:03 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-03-21 11:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add DSC support to MST path Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-04-11 16:25 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-04-11 16:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add DSC support to MST path Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-08-10 8:25 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2022-08-10 9:23 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-08-10 8:17 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-08-10 8:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add DSC support to MST path Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-08-15 17:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-08-15 17:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add DSC support to MST path Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-08-22 9:40 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Add DP MST DSC support to i915 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-08-22 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add DSC support to MST path Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-08-25 14:58 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2022-08-25 15:17 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-08-25 16:04 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2022-08-26 6:41 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YjNnTGO3AQE5lPRL@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox