From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 05/12] drm/edid: use struct detailed_timing member access in is_rb()
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 20:29:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkHwjkY89nQjw1J+@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c069669c2fe8f9c3061c7d1a413c75a33ec48813.1648477901.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 05:34:26PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Use struct detailed_timing member access instead of direct offsets to
> avoid casting.
>
> Use BUILD_BUG_ON() for sanity check.
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 10da6b9b14fb..39c8bf4ca082 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -2408,15 +2408,19 @@ drm_for_each_detailed_block(u8 *raw_edid, detailed_cb *cb, void *closure)
> }
>
> static void
> -is_rb(struct detailed_timing *t, void *data)
> +is_rb(struct detailed_timing *descriptor, void *data)
> {
> - u8 *r = (u8 *)t;
> + bool *res = data;
>
> - if (!is_display_descriptor(t, EDID_DETAIL_MONITOR_RANGE))
> + if (!is_display_descriptor(descriptor, EDID_DETAIL_MONITOR_RANGE))
> return;
>
> - if (r[10] == DRM_EDID_CVT_SUPPORT_FLAG && r[15] & 0x10)
> - *(bool *)data = true;
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(typeof(*descriptor), data.other_data.data.range.flags) != 10);
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(typeof(*descriptor), data.other_data.data.range.formula.cvt.flags) != 15);
> +
> + if (descriptor->data.other_data.data.range.flags == DRM_EDID_CVT_SUPPORT_FLAG &&
> + descriptor->data.other_data.data.range.formula.cvt.flags & 0x10)
> + *res = true;
> }
>
> /* EDID 1.4 defines this explicitly. For EDID 1.3, we guess, badly. */
> --
> 2.30.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-28 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-28 14:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/12] drm/edid: constify EDID parsing, with fixes Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 01/12] drm/edid: don't modify EDID while parsing Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 02/12] drm/edid: fix reduced blanking support check Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 17:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 03/12] drm/edid: pass a timing pointer to is_display_descriptor() Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 17:28 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/12] drm/edid: pass a timing pointer to is_detailed_timing_descriptor() Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 17:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 05/12] drm/edid: use struct detailed_timing member access in is_rb() Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 17:29 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/12] drm/edid: use struct detailed_timing member access in gtf2 functions Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 17:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 07/12] drm/edid: constify struct detailed_timing in lower level parsing Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 17:35 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/12] drm/edid: constify struct detailed_timing in parsing callbacks Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 17:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 09/12] drm/edid: constify struct edid passed to detailed blocks Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 17:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 10/12] drm/edid: constify struct edid passed around in callbacks and closure Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 17:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/12] drm/edid: add more general struct edid constness in the interfaces Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 17:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-28 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 12/12] drm/edid: split drm_add_edid_modes() to two Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 17:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-03-28 18:35 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-28 18:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/12] drm/edid: constify EDID parsing, with fixes Emil Velikov
2022-03-28 18:36 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-29 1:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/edid: constify EDID parsing, with fixes (rev2) Patchwork
2022-03-29 1:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-29 1:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-03-29 1:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-29 4:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-03-29 9:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/edid: constify EDID parsing, with fixes (rev3) Patchwork
2022-03-29 9:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-03-29 9:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-03-29 9:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-29 12:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkHwjkY89nQjw1J+@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox