Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display/drrs: Split the DRRS status per connector
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:17:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmFLPj2Qp41TwMZK@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418205221.291891-1-jose.souza@intel.com>

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 01:52:20PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Instead of keep the DRRS status of all connectors/pipe into a single
> i915_drrs_status what makes user-space parsing terrible moving
> each eDP connector status to its own folder.
> 
> As legacy support still returning the DRRS status of the first
> eDP connector in the main i915_drrs_status.

I was thinking more along the lines of 
crtc/drrs_something -> just the drrs state for this pipe
connector/drrs_something -> just the info whether this connector supports drrs or not

We could also think about hoisting all this stuf into intel_drrs.c
in the hopes of eventually hiding more of the drrs stuff from the
rest of the driver.

> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c  | 65 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> index 452d773fd4e34..0d7d2e750a4c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> @@ -1068,43 +1068,35 @@ static int i915_ddb_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int i915_drrs_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> +static int intel_drrs_status(struct seq_file *m, struct drm_connector *connector)
>  {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
> -	struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
> -	struct intel_connector *connector;
> +	struct intel_connector *intel_connector = to_intel_connector(connector);
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->dev);
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  
> -	drm_connector_list_iter_begin(&dev_priv->drm, &conn_iter);
> -	for_each_intel_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) {
> -		seq_printf(m, "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] DRRS type: %s\n",
> -			   connector->base.base.id, connector->base.name,
> -			   intel_drrs_type_str(intel_panel_drrs_type(connector)));
> -	}
> -	drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter);
> -
> -	seq_puts(m, "\n");
> +	seq_printf(m, "DRRS type: %s\n",
> +		   intel_drrs_type_str(intel_panel_drrs_type(intel_connector)));
>  
>  	for_each_intel_crtc(&dev_priv->drm, crtc) {
>  		const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
>  			to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
>  
> -		seq_printf(m, "[CRTC:%d:%s]:\n",
> -			   crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name);
> +		if (!(crtc_state->uapi.connector_mask & drm_connector_mask(connector)))
> +			continue;
>  
>  		mutex_lock(&crtc->drrs.mutex);
>  
>  		/* DRRS Supported */
> -		seq_printf(m, "\tDRRS Enabled: %s\n",
> +		seq_printf(m, "DRRS Enabled: %s\n",
>  			   str_yes_no(crtc_state->has_drrs));
>  
> -		seq_printf(m, "\tDRRS Active: %s\n",
> +		seq_printf(m, "DRRS Active: %s\n",
>  			   str_yes_no(intel_drrs_is_active(crtc)));
>  
> -		seq_printf(m, "\tBusy_frontbuffer_bits: 0x%X\n",
> +		seq_printf(m, "Busy_frontbuffer_bits: 0x%X\n",
>  			   crtc->drrs.busy_frontbuffer_bits);
>  
> -		seq_printf(m, "\tDRRS refresh rate: %s\n",
> +		seq_printf(m, "DRRS refresh rate: %s\n",
>  			   crtc->drrs.refresh_rate == DRRS_REFRESH_RATE_LOW ?
>  			   "low" : "high");
>  
> @@ -1114,6 +1106,28 @@ static int i915_drrs_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int i915_drrs_status(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
> +	struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
> +	struct drm_connector *connector = NULL;
> +
> +	/* Find the first eDP connector */
> +	drm_connector_list_iter_begin(&dev_priv->drm, &conn_iter);
> +	drm_for_each_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) {
> +		if (connector->connector_type != DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		break;
> +	}
> +	drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter);
> +
> +	if (!connector)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	return intel_drrs_status(m, connector);
> +}
> +
>  static bool
>  intel_lpsp_power_well_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  			      enum i915_power_well_id power_well_id)
> @@ -1990,6 +2004,14 @@ static int i915_psr_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  }
>  DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(i915_psr_status);
>  
> +static int i915_drrs_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct drm_connector *connector = m->private;
> +
> +	return intel_drrs_status(m, connector);
> +}
> +DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(i915_drrs_status);
> +
>  static int i915_lpsp_capability_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct drm_connector *connector = m->private;
> @@ -2232,6 +2254,11 @@ void intel_connector_debugfs_add(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
>  				    connector, &i915_psr_status_fops);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (connector->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP) {
> +		debugfs_create_file("i915_drrs_status", 0444, root,
> +				    connector, &i915_drrs_status_fops);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (connector->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort ||
>  	    connector->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_HDMIA ||
>  	    connector->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_HDMIB) {
> -- 
> 2.35.3

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-21 12:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-18 20:52 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display/drrs: Split the DRRS status per connector José Roberto de Souza
2022-04-18 20:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display/drrs: Remove repeated DRRS in i915_drrs_status José Roberto de Souza
2022-04-18 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display/drrs: Split the DRRS status per connector Patchwork
2022-04-18 23:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-04-21 12:17 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-04-21 13:18   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Souza, Jose
2022-04-21 13:43     ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YmFLPj2Qp41TwMZK@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox