From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
To: Karolina Drobnik <karolina.drobnik@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/gt: Only kick the signal worker if there's been an update
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:46:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ys1C6sG6VAuQvdlu@alfio.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7b953c7a4ba747c8196a164e2f8c5aef468d048.1657289332.git.karolina.drobnik@intel.com>
Hi Karolina,
> One impact of commit 047a1b877ed4 ("dma-buf & drm/amdgpu: remove
> dma_resv workaround") is that it stores many, many more fences. Whereas
> adding an exclusive fence used to remove the shared fence list, that
> list is now preserved and the write fences included into the list. Not
> just a single write fence, but now a write/read fence per context. That
> causes us to have to track more fences than before (albeit half of those
> are redundant), and we trigger more interrupts for multi-engine
> workloads.
>
> As part of reducing the impact from handling more signaling, we observe
> we only need to kick the signal worker after adding a fence iff we have
> good cause to believe that there is work to be done in processing the
> fence i.e. we either need to enable the interrupt or the request is
> already complete but we don't know if we saw the interrupt and so need
> to check signaling.
>
> References: 047a1b877ed4 ("dma-buf & drm/amdgpu: remove dma_resv workaround")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Karolina Drobnik <karolina.drobnik@intel.com>
sorry, I missed this patch.
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-12 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-08 14:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/i915: Apply waitboosting before fence wait Karolina Drobnik
2022-07-08 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/gem: Look for waitboosting across the whole object prior to individual waits Karolina Drobnik
2022-07-08 14:41 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-07-08 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915: Bump GT idling delay to 2 jiffies Karolina Drobnik
2022-07-08 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/gt: Only kick the signal worker if there's been an update Karolina Drobnik
2022-07-08 14:40 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-07-11 14:10 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-07-12 6:29 ` Karolina Drobnik
2022-07-12 21:55 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-07-12 9:46 ` Andi Shyti [this message]
2022-07-08 14:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Apply waitboosting before fence wait (rev2) Patchwork
2022-07-11 5:19 ` Karolina Drobnik
2022-07-08 15:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-07-09 2:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-07-11 5:20 ` Karolina Drobnik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ys1C6sG6VAuQvdlu@alfio.lan \
--to=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=karolina.drobnik@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox