From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>,
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Alan Previn" <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: Flush ct receive tasklet during reset preparation
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 13:47:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0tdwOK9oZ6oI6E2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241104214103.214702-1-zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 01:41:03PM -0800, Zhanjun Dong wrote:
> GuC to host communication is interrupt driven, the handling has 3
> parts: interrupt context, tasklet and request queue worker.
> During GuC reset prepare, interrupt is disabled before destroy
> contexts steps start. The IRQ and worker are flushed to finish
> any outstanding in-progress message handling. But, the tasklet
> flush is missing, it might causes 2 race conditions:
> 1. Tasklet runs after IRQ flushed, add request to queue after worker
> flush started, causes unexpected G2H message request processing,
> meanwhile, reset prepare code already get the context destroyed.
> This will causes error reported about bad context state.
> (https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/11349 and
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/12303)
> 2. Tasklet runs after intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare,
> ct_try_receive_message start to run, while intel_uc_reset_prepare
> already finished guc sanitize and set ct->enable to false. This will
> causes warning on incorrect ct->enable state.
> (https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/12439)
>
> Add the missing tasklet flush to flush all 3 parts.
>
Tvrtko, Zhanjun has later found out that this patch deserves a fixes
and cc-stable tags.
I wonder if it would be possible to manually pick this to drm-intel-fixes
and while at it add:
Fixes: eb5e7da736f3 ("drm/i915/guc: Reset implementation for new GuC interface")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.1+
Thoughts on the inclusion of the tags while cherry-picking for the fixes?
If okay, could you please do this since you are in charge of this round of the
drm-fixes?
The merged commit is: b939a08bc378 ("drm/i915/guc: Flush ct receive tasklet during reset preparation")
Thanks,
Rodrigo.
> Signed-off-by: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index 9ede6f240d79..353a9167c9a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -1688,6 +1688,10 @@ void intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare(struct intel_guc *guc)
> spin_lock_irq(guc_to_gt(guc)->irq_lock);
> spin_unlock_irq(guc_to_gt(guc)->irq_lock);
>
> + /* Flush tasklet */
> + tasklet_disable(&guc->ct.receive_tasklet);
> + tasklet_enable(&guc->ct.receive_tasklet);
> +
> guc_flush_submissions(guc);
> guc_flush_destroyed_contexts(guc);
> flush_work(&guc->ct.requests.worker);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-30 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-04 21:41 [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: Flush ct receive tasklet during reset preparation Zhanjun Dong
2024-11-05 0:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/guc: Flush ct receive tasklet during reset preparation (rev3) Patchwork
2024-11-05 18:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-05 21:29 ` Dong, Zhanjun
2024-11-30 18:47 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z0tdwOK9oZ6oI6E2@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@intel.com \
--cc=alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=zhanjun.dong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox