Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <imre.deak@intel.com>,
	<ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/display: use display runtime PM interfaces for for atomic state
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:39:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9CfeCYz3cgxC56u@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e3cf97853b3214fe56eea345c3e6226adde9e83.1741694400.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 02:05:37PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Convert intel_atomic_commit() and intel_atomic_commit_tail() to use
> display runtime PM interfaces. Also convert the wakeref member type to
> struct ref_tracker *, which is the same as intel_wakeref_t, but without
> the typedef.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c       | 12 ++++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 3afb85fe8536..b852ffe94a10 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
>  #include "intel_de.h"
>  #include "intel_display_driver.h"
>  #include "intel_display_power.h"
> +#include "intel_display_rpm.h"
>  #include "intel_display_types.h"
>  #include "intel_dmc.h"
>  #include "intel_dp.h"
> @@ -7229,7 +7230,7 @@ static void intel_atomic_dsb_finish(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  {
>  	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(state);
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(display->drm);
> +	struct drm_i915_private __maybe_unused *dev_priv = to_i915(display->drm);

hmm... we will need to take care of the unclaimed mmio infra at
some point... that is entirely display anyway... it should probably
move to under display...

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

>  	struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state, *old_crtc_state;
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  	struct intel_power_domain_mask put_domains[I915_MAX_PIPES] = {};
> @@ -7443,7 +7444,7 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  	 * toggling overhead at and above 60 FPS.
>  	 */
>  	intel_display_power_put_async_delay(display, POWER_DOMAIN_DC_OFF, wakeref, 17);
> -	intel_runtime_pm_put(&dev_priv->runtime_pm, state->wakeref);
> +	intel_display_rpm_put(display, state->wakeref);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Defer the cleanup of the old state to a separate worker to not
> @@ -7515,10 +7516,9 @@ int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *_state,
>  {
>  	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(dev);
>  	struct intel_atomic_state *state = to_intel_atomic_state(_state);
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	state->wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
> +	state->wakeref = intel_display_rpm_get(display);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The intel_legacy_cursor_update() fast path takes care
> @@ -7552,7 +7552,7 @@ int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *_state,
>  	if (ret) {
>  		drm_dbg_atomic(display->drm,
>  			       "Preparing state failed with %i\n", ret);
> -		intel_runtime_pm_put(&dev_priv->runtime_pm, state->wakeref);
> +		intel_display_rpm_put(display, state->wakeref);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -7562,7 +7562,7 @@ int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_atomic_state *_state,
>  
>  	if (ret) {
>  		drm_atomic_helper_unprepare_planes(dev, &state->base);
> -		intel_runtime_pm_put(&dev_priv->runtime_pm, state->wakeref);
> +		intel_display_rpm_put(display, state->wakeref);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index 99a6fd2900b9..7d9cc430a6b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ struct dpll {
>  struct intel_atomic_state {
>  	struct drm_atomic_state base;
>  
> -	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> +	struct ref_tracker *wakeref;
>  
>  	struct __intel_global_objs_state *global_objs;
>  	int num_global_objs;
> -- 
> 2.39.5
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-11 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-11 12:05 [PATCH 0/6] drm/i915/display: add display specific runtime PM interface Jani Nikula
2025-03-11 12:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/display: add display specific runtime PM wrappers Jani Nikula
2025-03-11 20:36   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-03-11 12:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/display: conversions to with_intel_display_rpm() Jani Nikula
2025-03-11 20:36   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-03-11 12:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/display: use display runtime PM interfaces for for atomic state Jani Nikula
2025-03-11 20:39   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-03-11 12:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/display: convert to display runtime PM interfaces Jani Nikula
2025-03-11 20:43   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-03-12 10:43     ` Jani Nikula
2025-03-12 19:57       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-03-11 12:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/power: " Jani Nikula
2025-03-11 20:45   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-03-11 12:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/compat: remove intel_runtime_pm.h Jani Nikula
2025-03-11 20:46   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-03-11 16:32 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: add display specific runtime PM interface Patchwork
2025-03-11 16:32 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-03-11 16:58 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-13 11:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/display: add display specific runtime PM interface (rev2) Patchwork
2025-03-13 11:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-03-13 11:27 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z9CfeCYz3cgxC56u@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox