From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] video/aperture: Only remove sysfb on the default vga pci device
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 10:48:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZC01zPuv/gAlWUoQ@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <090966b8-acad-62df-40aa-232471502edd@nvidia.com>
On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 01:59:33PM -0700, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> On 4/4/23 1:18 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Instead of calling aperture_remove_conflicting_devices() to remove the
> > conflicting devices, just call to aperture_detach_devices() to detach
> > the device that matches the same PCI BAR / aperture range. Since the
> > former is just a wrapper of the latter plus a sysfb_disable() call,
> > and now that's done in this function but only for the primary devices.
> >
> > This fixes a regression introduced by ee7a69aa38d8 ("fbdev: Disable
> > sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs"), where we
> > remove the sysfb when loading a driver for an unrelated pci device,
> > resulting in the user loosing their efifb console or similar.
> >
> > Note that in practice this only is a problem with the nvidia blob,
> > because that's the only gpu driver people might install which does not
> > come with an fbdev driver of it's own. For everyone else the real gpu
> > driver will restore a working console.
>
> It might be worth noting that this also affects devices that have no driver
> installed, or where the driver failed to initialize or was configured not to
> set a mode. E.g. I reproduced this problem on a laptop with i915.modeset=0
> and an NVIDIA driver that calls drm_fbdev_generic_setup. It would also
> reproduce on a system that sets modeset=0 (or has a GPU that's too new for
> its corresponding kernel driver) and that passes an NVIDIA GPU through to a
> VM using vfio-pci since that also calls
> aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices.
>
> I agree that in practice this will mostly affect people with our driver
> until I get my changes to add drm_fbdev_generic_setup checked in. But these
> other cases don't seem all that unlikely to me.
Thomas Z. refactored the entire modeset=0 handling to be more consistent
across drivers, so I think in practice it'll again only happen with the
nvidia blob driver (unless you patch in the call to
drm_firmware_drivers_only()). Or if you dont use nomodeset or similar and
instead use a driver-specific module option, which isn't what howtos in
distros recommend.
I can add this to the commit message if you want?
-Daniel
>
> -- Aaron
>
> > Also note that in the referenced bug there's confusion that this same
> > bug also happens on amdgpu. But that was just another amdgpu specific
> > regression, which just happened to happen at roughly the same time and
> > with the same user-observable symptoms. That bug is fixed now, see
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216331#c15
> >
> > Note that we should not have any such issues on non-pci multi-gpu
> > issues, because I could only find two such cases:
> > - SoC with some external panel over spi or similar. These panel
> > drivers do not use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(),
> > so no problem.
> > - vga+mga, which is a direct console driver and entirely bypasses all
> > this.
> >
> > For the above reasons the cc: stable is just notionally, this patch
> > will need a backport and that's up to nvidia if they care enough.
> >
> > v2:
> > - Explain a bit better why other multi-gpu that aren't pci shouldn't
> > have any issues with making all this fully pci specific.
> >
> > v3
> > - polish commit message (Javier)
> >
> > Fixes: ee7a69aa38d8 ("fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs")
> > Tested-by: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
> > References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216303#c28
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > Cc: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
> > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> > Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
> > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.19+ (if someone else does the backport)
> > ---
> > drivers/video/aperture.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/aperture.c b/drivers/video/aperture.c
> > index 8f1437339e49..2394c2d310f8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/aperture.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/aperture.c
> > @@ -321,15 +321,16 @@ int aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices(struct pci_dev *pdev, const char *na
> > primary = pdev == vga_default_device();
> > + if (primary)
> > + sysfb_disable();
> > +
> > for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; ++bar) {
> > if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, bar) & IORESOURCE_MEM))
> > continue;
> > base = pci_resource_start(pdev, bar);
> > size = pci_resource_len(pdev, bar);
> > - ret = aperture_remove_conflicting_devices(base, size, name);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > + aperture_detach_devices(base, size);
> > }
> > if (primary) {
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-05 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-04 20:18 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/gma500: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] video/aperture: use generic code to figure out the vga default device Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 11:27 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/aperture: Remove primary argument Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 21:20 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2023-04-05 9:25 ` Thierry Reding
2023-04-05 11:30 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] video/aperture: Only kick vgacon when the pdev is decoding vga Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 11:31 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] video/aperture: Move vga handling to pci function Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 11:34 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] video/aperture: Drop primary argument Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 11:36 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] video/aperture: Only remove sysfb on the default vga pci device Daniel Vetter
2023-04-04 20:59 ` Aaron Plattner
2023-04-05 8:48 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2023-04-05 11:37 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] fbdev: Simplify fb_is_primary_device for x86 Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 11:40 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-04 23:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/8] drm/gma500: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers Patchwork
2023-04-04 23:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-04-04 23:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-04-05 7:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] " Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05 8:05 ` Patrik Jakobsson
2023-04-05 8:15 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05 8:07 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05 8:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 9:26 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05 9:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 11:00 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05 11:16 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 13:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 14:32 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05 16:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 16:54 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 17:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 17:43 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-05 17:46 ` Patrik Jakobsson
2023-04-06 7:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-06 11:16 ` Patrik Jakobsson
2023-04-05 8:19 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-05 9:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-04-05 10:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/8] " Patchwork
2023-04-06 7:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] " Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-06 8:38 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-06 8:49 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-06 9:05 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-04-06 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [1/8] drm/gma500: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZC01zPuv/gAlWUoQ@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=aplattner@nvidia.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox