From: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
To: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] i915/pmu: Add support for total context runtime for GuC back-end
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 17:11:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEm9ryBi9pnfFJCO@orsosgc001.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h6t59nze.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:41:41AM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
>On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 17:14:32 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>
>Hi Umesh,
>
>> GPU accumulates the context runtime in a 32 bit counter - CTX_TIMESTAMP
>> in the context image. This value is saved/restored on context switches.
>> KMD accumulates these values into a 64 bit counter taking care of any
>> overflows as needed. This count provides the basis for client specific
>> busyness in the fdinfo interface.
>>
>> KMD accumulation happens just before the context is unpinned and when
>> context switches out. This works for execlist back-end since execlist
>> scheduling has visibility into context switches. With GuC mode, KMD does
>> not have visibility into context switches and this counter is
>> accumulated only when context is unpinned. Context is unpinned once the
>> context scheduling is successfully disabled. Disabling context
>> scheduling is an asynchronous operation.
>
>This means guc_context_unpin() is called asynchronously, correct? From
>guc_context_sched_disable()?
correct
>
>> Also if a context is servicing frequent requests, scheduling may never be
>> disabled on it.
>>
>> For GuC mode, since updates to the context runtime may be delayed, add
>> hooks to update the context runtime in a worker thread as well as when
>> a user queries for it.
>>
>> Limitation:
>> - If a context is never switched out or runs for a long period of time,
>> the runtime value of CTX_TIMESTAMP may never be updated, so the
>> counter value may be unreliable. This patch does not support such
>> cases. Such support must be available from the GuC FW and it is WIP.
>>
>> This patch is an extract from previous work authored by John/Umesh here -
>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/496441/?series=105085&rev=4
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
>> Co-developed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c | 12 +++++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h | 5 +++
>> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
>> index 2aa63ec521b8..e01f222e9e42 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
>> @@ -578,16 +578,24 @@ void intel_context_bind_parent_child(struct intel_context *parent,
>> child->parallel.parent = parent;
>> }
>>
>> -u64 intel_context_get_total_runtime_ns(const struct intel_context *ce)
>> +u64 intel_context_get_total_runtime_ns(struct intel_context *ce)
>> {
>> u64 total, active;
>>
>> + if (ce->ops->update_stats)
>> + ce->ops->update_stats(ce);
>> +
>> total = ce->stats.runtime.total;
>> if (ce->ops->flags & COPS_RUNTIME_CYCLES)
>> total *= ce->engine->gt->clock_period_ns;
>>
>> active = READ_ONCE(ce->stats.active);
>> - if (active)
>> + /*
>> + * When COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL is set for ce->cops, the backend
>> + * already provides the total active time of the context,
>
>Where is this done in the GuC case? I looked but couldn't find it (at least
>in this version of the patch, it is there in the old version).
In this case, the backend is not providing the total active time, I
guess I should drop this logic provided ce->stats.active is 0 for GuC
mode.
>
>> + * so skip this calculation when this flag is set.
>> + */
>> + if (active && !(ce->ops->flags & COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL))
>> active = intel_context_clock() - active;
>>
>> return total + active;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
>> index 0a8d553da3f4..720809523e2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
>> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ intel_context_clear_nopreempt(struct intel_context *ce)
>> clear_bit(CONTEXT_NOPREEMPT, &ce->flags);
>> }
>>
>> -u64 intel_context_get_total_runtime_ns(const struct intel_context *ce);
>> +u64 intel_context_get_total_runtime_ns(struct intel_context *ce);
>> u64 intel_context_get_avg_runtime_ns(struct intel_context *ce);
>>
>> static inline u64 intel_context_clock(void)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
>> index e36670f2e626..58b0294d359d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
>> @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ struct intel_context_ops {
>> #define COPS_RUNTIME_CYCLES_BIT 1
>> #define COPS_RUNTIME_CYCLES BIT(COPS_RUNTIME_CYCLES_BIT)
>>
>> +#define COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL_BIT 2
>> +#define COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL BIT(COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL_BIT)
>> +
>> int (*alloc)(struct intel_context *ce);
>>
>> void (*revoke)(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_request *rq,
>> @@ -58,6 +61,8 @@ struct intel_context_ops {
>>
>> void (*sched_disable)(struct intel_context *ce);
>>
>> + void (*update_stats)(struct intel_context *ce);
>> +
>> void (*reset)(struct intel_context *ce);
>> void (*destroy)(struct kref *kref);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>> index 88e881b100cf..8048a3e97a68 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>> @@ -1402,13 +1402,25 @@ static void __update_guc_busyness_stats(struct intel_guc *guc)
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->timestamp.lock, flags);
>> }
>>
>> +static void guc_context_update_clks(struct intel_context *ce)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&guc->timestamp.lock, flags);
>> + lrc_update_runtime(ce);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->timestamp.lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void guc_timestamp_ping(struct work_struct *wrk)
>> {
>> struct intel_guc *guc = container_of(wrk, typeof(*guc),
>> timestamp.work.work);
>> struct intel_uc *uc = container_of(guc, typeof(*uc), guc);
>> struct intel_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
>> + struct intel_context *ce;
>> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>> + unsigned long index;
>> int srcu, ret;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -1424,6 +1436,10 @@ static void guc_timestamp_ping(struct work_struct *wrk)
>> with_intel_runtime_pm(>->i915->runtime_pm, wakeref)
>> __update_guc_busyness_stats(guc);
>
>How do we know the context images are pinned at this point which is needed
>for the code below? Where is the pinning happening?
Ah, maybe this should just call - guc_context_update_stats()
>
>> + /* adjust context stats for overflow */
>> + xa_for_each(&guc->context_lookup, index, ce)
>> + guc_context_update_clks(ce);
>
>Here are we saying that we need to do this because the context can get
>switched out (and context image saved) and back in multiple times without
>the context getting unpinned? Otherwise guc_context_unpin() would call
>lrc_update_runtime() and we wouldn't have to do this here.
Mainly for 32 bit overflows. The busyness value obtained from the
context image is a 32 bit value and could wrap around. If we keep
grabbing it periodically and accumulate it in the 64 bit value in ce
stats, we should be good.
>
>> +
>> intel_gt_reset_unlock(gt, srcu);
>>
>> guc_enable_busyness_worker(guc);
>> @@ -1505,6 +1521,17 @@ void intel_guc_busyness_unpark(struct intel_gt *gt)
>> guc_enable_busyness_worker(guc);
>> }
>>
>> +static void guc_context_update_stats(struct intel_context *ce)
>> +{
>> + if (!intel_context_pin_if_active(ce)) {
>> + WRITE_ONCE(ce->stats.active, 0);
>
>This is related to the question above about where is ce->stats.active being
>updated in GuC case. If it is not being updated then we wouldn't have to do
>this here, we could just initialize it to 0 once or it might already be
>initialized to 0 (if say ce->stats was kzalloc'd).
Agree, will drop this.
>
>/> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + guc_context_update_clks(ce);
>> + intel_context_unpin(ce);
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline bool
>> submission_disabled(struct intel_guc *guc)
>> {
>> @@ -2774,6 +2801,7 @@ static void guc_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
>> {
>> struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
>>
>> + lrc_update_runtime(ce);
>
>If we call lrc_update_runtime from these 3 code paths (as is done in this
>patch), we would need to hold guc->timestamp.lock here. Is that happening
>(I don't see it) or we need to call guc_context_update_clks() here? I am
>assuming the context image is pinned here so pinning is not an issue.
Maybe will just call guc_context_update_clks() here.
thanks,
Umesh
>
>> unpin_guc_id(guc, ce);
>> lrc_unpin(ce);
>>
>> @@ -3455,6 +3483,7 @@ static void remove_from_context(struct i915_request *rq)
>> }
>>
>> static const struct intel_context_ops guc_context_ops = {
>> + .flags = COPS_RUNTIME_CYCLES | COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL,
>> .alloc = guc_context_alloc,
>>
>> .close = guc_context_close,
>> @@ -3473,6 +3502,8 @@ static const struct intel_context_ops guc_context_ops = {
>>
>> .sched_disable = guc_context_sched_disable,
>>
>> + .update_stats = guc_context_update_stats,
>> +
>> .reset = lrc_reset,
>> .destroy = guc_context_destroy,
>>
>> @@ -3728,6 +3759,7 @@ static int guc_virtual_context_alloc(struct intel_context *ce)
>> }
>>
>> static const struct intel_context_ops virtual_guc_context_ops = {
>> + .flags = COPS_RUNTIME_CYCLES | COPS_RUNTIME_ACTIVE_TOTAL,
>> .alloc = guc_virtual_context_alloc,
>>
>> .close = guc_context_close,
>> @@ -3745,6 +3777,7 @@ static const struct intel_context_ops virtual_guc_context_ops = {
>> .exit = guc_virtual_context_exit,
>>
>> .sched_disable = guc_context_sched_disable,
>> + .update_stats = guc_context_update_stats,
>>
>> .destroy = guc_context_destroy,
>>
>> --
>> 2.36.1
>>
>
>Thanks.
>--
>Ashutosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-27 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-05 0:14 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] fdinfo: Enable some support for GuC based client busyness Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-04-05 0:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] i915/pmu: Add support for total context runtime for GuC back-end Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-04-24 17:41 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-04-27 0:11 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa [this message]
2023-04-27 0:51 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-04-27 18:57 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-04-05 0:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/fdinfo: Enable fdinfo for GuC backends Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-04-05 1:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for fdinfo: Enable some support for GuC based client busyness Patchwork
2023-04-05 1:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-04-05 12:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-04-27 22:47 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-04-27 22:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] i915/pmu: Add support for total context runtime for GuC back-end Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-04-28 21:55 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEm9ryBi9pnfFJCO@orsosgc001.jf.intel.com \
--to=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox