From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Add support for disabling any CRTCs during HW readout/sanitization
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 17:02:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEvR++IEZDI+uKB5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230426165305.2049341-6-imre.deak@intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 07:52:59PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> During HW readout/sanitization CRTCs can be disabled only if they don't
> have an attached encoder (and so the encoder disable hooks don't need to
> be called). An upcoming patch will need to disable CRTCs also with an
> attached an encoder, so add support for this.
>
> For bigjoiner configs the encoder disabling hooks require the slave CRTC
> states, so add these too to the atomic state. Since the connector atomic
> state is already up-to-date when the CRTC is disabled the connector
> state needs to be updated (reset) after the CRTC is disabled, make this
> so. Follow the proper order of disabling first all bigjoiner slaves,
> then any port synced CRTC slaves followed by the CRTC originally
> requested to be disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> index a66085cf82bab..f613c074187a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> @@ -50,10 +50,39 @@ static void set_encoder_for_connector(struct intel_connector *connector,
> }
> }
>
> +static void reset_encoder_connector_state(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> + struct intel_connector *connector;
> + struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
> +
> + drm_connector_list_iter_begin(&i915->drm, &conn_iter);
> + for_each_intel_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) {
> + if (connector->base.encoder != &encoder->base)
> + continue;
> +
> + set_encoder_for_connector(connector, NULL);
> +
> + connector->base.dpms = DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF;
> + connector->base.encoder = NULL;
> + }
> + drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter);
> +}
> +
> +static void reset_crtc_encoder_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> +
> + for_each_encoder_on_crtc(&i915->drm, &crtc->base, encoder) {
> + reset_encoder_connector_state(encoder);
> + encoder->base.crtc = NULL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> {
> - struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> struct intel_bw_state *bw_state =
> to_intel_bw_state(i915->display.bw.obj.state);
> @@ -65,9 +94,8 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
> struct intel_plane *plane;
> struct drm_atomic_state *state;
> - struct intel_crtc_state *temp_crtc_state;
> + struct intel_crtc *temp_crtc;
> enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> - int ret;
>
> if (!crtc_state->hw.active)
> return;
> @@ -92,10 +120,17 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> to_intel_atomic_state(state)->internal = true;
>
> /* Everything's already locked, -EDEADLK can't happen. */
> - temp_crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> - ret = drm_atomic_add_affected_connectors(state, &crtc->base);
> + for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&i915->drm, temp_crtc,
> + BIT(pipe) |
> + intel_crtc_bigjoiner_slave_pipes(crtc_state)) {
> + struct intel_crtc_state *temp_crtc_state =
> + intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, temp_crtc);
> + int ret;
>
> - drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, IS_ERR(temp_crtc_state) || ret);
> + ret = drm_atomic_add_affected_connectors(state, &temp_crtc->base);
> +
> + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, IS_ERR(temp_crtc_state) || ret);
> + }
It's a bit weird to have this loop inside the function that
otherwise seems to be called individually for each of the
joined pipes. Why do we need this?
>
> i915->display.funcs.display->crtc_disable(to_intel_atomic_state(state), crtc);
>
> @@ -120,8 +155,7 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm,
> drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(&crtc_state->uapi, NULL) < 0);
>
> - for_each_encoder_on_crtc(&i915->drm, &crtc->base, encoder)
> - encoder->base.crtc = NULL;
> + reset_crtc_encoder_state(crtc);
>
> intel_fbc_disable(crtc);
> intel_update_watermarks(i915);
> @@ -272,6 +306,77 @@ static void intel_sanitize_fifo_underrun_reporting(const struct intel_crtc_state
> !HAS_GMCH(i915));
> }
>
> +static u32 get_transcoder_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 transcoder_mask)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *slave_crtc;
> + u32 pipes = 0;
> +
> + for_each_intel_crtc(&i915->drm, slave_crtc) {
> + struct intel_crtc_state *slave_crtc_state =
> + to_intel_crtc_state(slave_crtc->base.state);
> +
> + if (slave_crtc_state->cpu_transcoder == INVALID_TRANSCODER)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (transcoder_mask & BIT(slave_crtc_state->cpu_transcoder))
> + pipes |= BIT(slave_crtc->pipe);
> + }
> +
> + return pipes;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 get_bigjoiner_slave_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 master_pipes)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *master_crtc;
> + u32 pipes = 0;
> +
> + for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&i915->drm, master_crtc, master_pipes) {
> + struct intel_crtc_state *master_crtc_state =
> + to_intel_crtc_state(master_crtc->base.state);
> +
> + pipes |= intel_crtc_bigjoiner_slave_pipes(master_crtc_state);
> + }
> +
> + return pipes;
> +}
> +
> +static void kill_bigjoiner_slave_noatomic(struct intel_crtc *master_crtc)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(master_crtc->base.dev);
> + struct intel_crtc_state *master_crtc_state =
> + to_intel_crtc_state(master_crtc->base.state);
> + struct intel_crtc *slave_crtc;
> +
> + for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&i915->drm, slave_crtc,
> + intel_crtc_bigjoiner_slave_pipes(master_crtc_state)) {
> + struct intel_crtc_state *slave_crtc_state =
> + to_intel_crtc_state(slave_crtc->base.state);
> +
> + slave_crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes = 0;
> + }
> +
> + master_crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void disable_crtc_with_slaves(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
> + u32 bigjoiner_masters = BIT(crtc->pipe) |
> + get_transcoder_pipes(i915, crtc_state->sync_mode_slaves_mask);
The resulting bitmask would seem to also include the bigjoiner slaves.
> + u32 bigjoiner_slaves = get_bigjoiner_slave_pipes(i915, bigjoiner_masters);
> + struct intel_crtc *temp_crtc;
> +
> + for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&i915->drm, temp_crtc, bigjoiner_slaves)
> + intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(temp_crtc, ctx);
> +
> + for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&i915->drm, temp_crtc, bigjoiner_masters) {
> + intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(temp_crtc, ctx);
> + kill_bigjoiner_slave_noatomic(temp_crtc);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void intel_sanitize_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> {
> @@ -299,10 +404,11 @@ static void intel_sanitize_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> /*
> * Adjust the state of the output pipe according to whether we have
> * active connectors/encoders.
> + * TODO: Add support for MST
> */
> if (crtc_state->hw.active && !intel_crtc_has_encoders(crtc) &&
> !intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> - intel_crtc_disable_noatomic(crtc, ctx);
> + disable_crtc_with_slaves(crtc, ctx);
I'd like to keep the _noatomic() in the name.
> }
>
> static bool has_bogus_dpll_config(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> --
> 2.37.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-28 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-26 16:52 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] drm/i915/tc: Add a workaround for an IOM/TCSS firmware hang issue Imre Deak
2023-04-26 16:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Fix PIPEDMC disabling for a bigjoiner configuration Imre Deak
2023-04-26 16:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Make the CRTC wrt. CSC state consistent during sanitize-disabling Imre Deak
2023-04-26 17:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-26 19:51 ` Imre Deak
2023-04-26 16:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Update connector atomic state before crtc sanitize-disabling Imre Deak
2023-04-26 16:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Factor out set_encoder_for_connector() Imre Deak
2023-04-26 16:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Add support for disabling any CRTCs during HW readout/sanitization Imre Deak
2023-04-28 14:02 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2023-04-28 17:22 ` Imre Deak
2023-04-28 17:47 ` Imre Deak
2023-04-29 7:50 ` Imre Deak
2023-04-26 16:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/dp: Add link training debug and error printing helpers Imre Deak
2023-04-28 14:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-28 19:30 ` Imre Deak
2023-04-26 16:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/dp: Convert link training error to debug message on disconnected sink Imre Deak
2023-04-26 16:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/dp: Prevent link training fallback on disconnected port Imre Deak
2023-04-26 16:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/dp: Factor out intel_dp_get_active_pipes() Imre Deak
2023-04-26 16:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: Factor out call_with_modeset_ctx() Imre Deak
2023-04-28 14:32 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-28 18:34 ` Imre Deak
2023-04-26 16:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/tc: Reset TypeC PHYs left enabled in DP-alt mode after the sink disconnects Imre Deak
2023-04-26 19:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/tc: Add a workaround for an IOM/TCSS firmware hang issue Patchwork
2023-04-26 19:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-04-26 22:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEvR++IEZDI+uKB5@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox