Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 00/10] drm/hdcp: Pull HDCP auth/exchange/check into helpers

[Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@kernel.org>]

On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 02:07:51AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 20/05/2023 00:16, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 07:55:47PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On 19/04/2023 18:43, Mark Yacoub wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > This is v10 of the HDCP patches. The patches are authored by Sean Paul.
> > > > I rebased and addressed the review comments in v6-v10.
> > > > 
> > > > Main change in v10 is handling the kernel test bot warnings.
> > > > 
> > > > Patches 1-4 focus on moving the common HDCP helpers to common DRM.
> > > > This introduces a slight change in the original intel flow
> > > > as it splits the unique driver protocol from the generic implementation.
> > > > 
> > > > Patches 5-7 split the HDCP flow on the i915 driver to make use of the common DRM helpers.
> > > > 
> > > > Patches 8-10 implement HDCP on MSM driver.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Mark Yacoub
> > > > 
> > > > Sean Paul (10):
> > > >     drm/hdcp: Add drm_hdcp_atomic_check()
> > > >     drm/hdcp: Avoid changing crtc state in hdcp atomic check
> > > >     drm/hdcp: Update property value on content type and user changes
> > > >     drm/hdcp: Expand HDCP helper library for enable/disable/check
> > > >     drm/i915/hdcp: Consolidate HDCP setup/state cache
> > > >     drm/i915/hdcp: Retain hdcp_capable return codes
> > > >     drm/i915/hdcp: Use HDCP helpers for i915
> > > >     dt-bindings: msm/dp: Add bindings for HDCP registers
> > > >     arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add support for HDCP in dp-controller
> > > 
> > > Dear i915 maintainers,
> > > 
> > > I wanted to ping you regarding this patch series. If there are no comments
> > > for the series from you side, would it be possible to land Intel-specific
> > > and generic patches into drm-intel tree? We will continue working on the msm
> > > specific parts and merge them through the msm tree.
> > 
> > pushed to drm-intel-next.
> > 
> > should be propagated in a few weeks to drm-next on our next pull request.
> 
> Probably there is some kind of confusion here. You've pushed the DSC
> patches, while the response was sent to the HDCP series.

I'm sorry, my confusion for replying to the wrong thread.

So, on this one here I believe it would be helpful if there's a split
in the series with the already reviewed ones related to i915 are resent
separated from the rest, send with --subject-prefix="CI" so when that
pass CI we just merge it through drm-intel-next


> 
> -- 
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
>