Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/display: Account for DSC not split case while computing cdclk
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 12:16:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLj7WIjcjdjCE5Ft@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230713103346.1163315-7-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 04:03:33PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Currently we assume 2 Pixels Per Clock (PPC) while computing
> plane cdclk and min_cdlck. In cases where DSC single engine
> is used the throughput is 1 PPC.
> 
> So account for the above case, while computing cdclk.
> 
> v2: Use helper to get the adjusted pixel rate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c         |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c          | 12 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h          |  2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c |  4 ++--
>  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index dcc1f6941b60..701909966545 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -2508,7 +2508,7 @@ static int intel_pixel_rate_to_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  	int pixel_rate = crtc_state->pixel_rate;
>  
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10)
> -		return DIV_ROUND_UP(pixel_rate, 2);
> +		return intel_dsc_get_adjusted_pixel_rate(crtc_state, pixel_rate);
>  	else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 9 ||
>  		 IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
>  		return pixel_rate;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> index 9d76c2756784..bbfdbf06da68 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> @@ -1038,3 +1038,15 @@ void intel_dsc_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  out:
>  	intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain, wakeref);
>  }
> +
> +int intel_dsc_get_adjusted_pixel_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, int pixel_rate)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * If single VDSC engine is used, it uses one pixel per clock
> +	 * otherwise we use two pixels per clock.
> +	 */
> +	if (crtc_state->dsc.compression_enable && !crtc_state->dsc.dsc_split)
> +		return pixel_rate;
> +
> +	return DIV_ROUND_UP(pixel_rate, 2);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h
> index 2cc41ff08909..3bb4b1980b6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h
> @@ -28,4 +28,6 @@ void intel_dsc_dsi_pps_write(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  void intel_dsc_dp_pps_write(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  			    const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>  
> +int intel_dsc_get_adjusted_pixel_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, int pixel_rate);
> +
>  #endif /* __INTEL_VDSC_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> index 6b01a0b68b97..9eeb25ec4be9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include "intel_fb.h"
>  #include "intel_fbc.h"
>  #include "intel_psr.h"
> +#include "intel_vdsc.h"
>  #include "skl_scaler.h"
>  #include "skl_universal_plane.h"
>  #include "skl_watermark.h"
> @@ -263,8 +264,7 @@ static int icl_plane_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  {
>  	unsigned int pixel_rate = intel_plane_pixel_rate(crtc_state, plane_state);
>  
> -	/* two pixels per clock */
> -	return DIV_ROUND_UP(pixel_rate, 2);
> +	return intel_dsc_get_adjusted_pixel_rate(crtc_state, pixel_rate);

Hi Ankit,

I think the thing what you are taking of is already handled here in intel_cdclk.c:

	/*
         * When we decide to use only one VDSC engine, since
         * each VDSC operates with 1 ppc throughput, pixel clock
         * cannot be higher than the VDSC clock (cdclk)
         * If there 2 VDSC engines, then pixel clock can't be higher than
         * VDSC clock(cdclk) * 2 and so on.
         */
        if (crtc_state->dsc.compression_enable) {
                int num_vdsc_instances = intel_dsc_get_num_vdsc_instances(crtc_state);

                min_cdclk = max_t(int, min_cdclk,
                                  DIV_ROUND_UP(crtc_state->pixel_rate,
                                               num_vdsc_instances));
        }

Also even if something still have to be done here, I think we should preferrably
deal with anything related to DSC in a single place, to prevent any kind of
confusion(when those checks are scattered in different places, it is way more easy to forget/not notice something)

I think intel_pixel_rate_to_cdclk isn't supposed to know anything about DSC or any other specifics like audio checks and etc - it is
just dealing with the "default" uncompressed case.
Any other additional limitations or checks we apply after those, as there are
quite many anyway.

Stan


>  }
>  
>  static void
> -- 
> 2.40.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-20  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-13 10:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/19] DSC misc fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/dp: Consider output_format while computing dsc bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/dp: Move compressed bpp check with 420 format inside the helper Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-14  3:23   ` Murthy, Arun R
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/19] drm/i915/dp_mst: Use output_format to get the final link bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915/dp: Use consistent name for link bpp and compressed bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915/dp: Update Bigjoiner interface bits for computing " Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-20  9:29   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-07-24 12:19     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-07-25 10:13       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-07-25 11:19         ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-07-28  4:18           ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/display: Account for DSC not split case while computing cdclk Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-20  9:16   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2023-07-25  5:52     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-07-25 10:10       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-07-25 11:22         ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/intel_cdclk: Add vdsc with bigjoiner constraints on min_cdlck Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-20  9:24   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-07-25  6:01     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915/dp: Remove extra logs for printing DSC info Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-14  3:28   ` Murthy, Arun R
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/19] drm/display/dp: Fix the DP DSC Receiver cap size Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915/dp: Avoid forcing DSC BPC for MST case Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915/dp: Add functions to get min/max src input bpc with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915/dp: Check min bpc DSC limits for dsc_force_bpc also Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915/dp: Avoid left shift of DSC output bpp by 4 Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-20  9:31   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/dp: Rename helper to get DSC max pipe_bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915/dp: Separate out functions for edp/DP for computing DSC bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/dp: Add DSC BPC/BPP constraints while selecting pipe bpp with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915/dp: Separate out function to get compressed bpp with joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915/dp: Get optimal link config to have best compressed bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 10:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915: Query compressed bpp properly using correct DPCD and DP Spec info Ankit Nautiyal
2023-07-13 11:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for DSC misc fixes (rev4) Patchwork
2023-07-13 12:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-07-13 15:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-06-30 12:46 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/19] DSC misc fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2023-06-30 12:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/display: Account for DSC not split case while computing cdclk Ankit Nautiyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZLj7WIjcjdjCE5Ft@intel.com \
    --to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox