From: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for i915/guc: Get runtime pm in busyness worker only if already active
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 12:56:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQS25Cfog54gH4k2@unerlige-ril> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <169475627315.32041.7069993158124024215@emeril.freedesktop.org>
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:37:53AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> Patch Details
>
>Series: i915/guc: Get runtime pm in busyness worker only if already active
>URL: [1]https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/123744/
>State: failure
>Details: [2]https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_123744v1/index.html
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13635 -> Patchwork_123744v1
>
>Summary
>
> FAILURE
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_123744v1 absolutely need to
> be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_123744v1, please notify your bug team
> (lgci.bug.filing@intel.com) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in
> CI.
>
> External URL:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_123744v1/index.html
>
>Participating hosts (40 -> 40)
>
> Additional (1): fi-kbl-soraka
> Missing (1): fi-snb-2520m
>
>Possible new issues
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_123744v1:
>
> IGT changes
>
> Possible regressions
>
> * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
>
> * fi-skl-guc: [3]PASS -> [4]DMESG-FAIL
Not related to changes in this patch. Ran the test a couple times on MTL
and not seeing any failures.
>
> * igt@i915_selftest@live@perf:
>
> * fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [5]ABORT
Unrelated since this does not use GuC.
Umesh
>
>Known issues
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-15 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-15 1:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] i915/guc: Get runtime pm in busyness worker only if already active Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-09-15 5:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2023-09-15 19:56 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa [this message]
2023-09-15 23:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2023-09-19 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for i915/guc: Get runtime pm in busyness worker only if already active (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZQS25Cfog54gH4k2@unerlige-ril \
--to=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox