From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
LGCI Bug Filing <lgci.bug.filing@intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev2)
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 19:30:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZV46nbU1j0lX_Jrq@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874jhdn1vn.fsf@intel.com>
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:17:48PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, "Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen@intel.com> wrote:
> >> From: Musial, Ewelina <ewelina.musial@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 4:25 PM
...
> >> But this list had only series which were in queue here https://intel-gfx-
> >> ci.01.org/queue/index.html and today I was checking exactly how queue for
> >> shards is created and there are jobs which are not displayed there.
> >> Directly in Jenkins we do have multiple more jobs than in this queue only
> >> and I also killed them. I was discussing exactly this case today with
> >> Michał and he pointed out that in explanation below queues we do have
> >> highlighted: Due to technical limitation this is just an approximation of
> >> the queue. It is good for assessing the length of the queue, but should
> >> not be considered as completely accurate.
> > OK. So could have been in the list but not sure.
>
> Okay, timeout.
>
> I just pushed the series. I trust Hans' testing here, considering the
> likely platform impact of the series and CI coverage of said platforms.
>
> Thanks for the patches and review.
Thank you, Jani, Hans, Ville and others!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-22 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-03 20:18 [Intel-gfx] [rft, PATCH v4 00/16] drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 01/16] drm/i915/dsi: assume BXT gpio works for non-native GPIO Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 02/16] drm/i915/dsi: switch mipi_exec_gpio() from dev_priv to i915 Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 03/16] drm/i915/dsi: clarify GPIO exec sequence Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 04/16] drm/i915/dsi: rename platform specific *_exec_gpio() to *_gpio_set_value() Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 05/16] drm/i915/dsi: bxt/icl GPIO set value do not need gpio source Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 06/16] drm/i915/dsi: Replace while(1) with one with clear exit condition Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 07/16] drm/i915/dsi: Get rid of redundant 'else' Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 08/16] drm/i915/dsi: Replace check with a (missing) MIPI sequence name Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 09/16] drm/i915/dsi: Remove GPIO lookup table at the end of intel_dsi_vbt_gpio_init() Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 10/16] drm/i915/dsi: Fix wrong initial value for GPIOs in bxt_gpio_set_value() Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 11/16] drm/i915/dsi: Extract common soc_gpio_set_value() helper Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 12/16] drm/i915/dsi: Replace poking of VLV GPIOs behind the driver's back Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 13/16] drm/i915/dsi: Prepare soc_gpio_set_value() to distinguish GPIO communities Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 14/16] drm/i915/dsi: Replace poking of CHV GPIOs behind the driver's back Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 15/16] drm/i915/dsi: Combine checks in mipi_exec_gpio() Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 16/16] drm/i915/iosf: Drop unused APIs Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-03 22:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO Patchwork
2023-11-03 22:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-16 8:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [rft, PATCH v4 00/16] " Hans de Goede
2023-11-16 10:15 ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-17 21:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-21 10:28 ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-17 21:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-16 12:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev2) Patchwork
2023-11-16 12:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-16 16:59 ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-21 10:43 ` Illipilli, TejasreeX
2023-11-22 10:55 ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-22 11:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-22 13:38 ` Musial, Ewelina
2023-11-22 14:04 ` Saarinen, Jani
2023-11-22 14:24 ` Musial, Ewelina
2023-11-22 15:01 ` Saarinen, Jani
2023-11-22 17:17 ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-22 17:30 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-11-23 6:46 ` Musial, Ewelina
2023-11-16 18:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev4) Patchwork
2023-11-16 18:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-20 23:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO (rev5) Patchwork
2023-11-21 0:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-21 9:27 ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-21 10:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZV46nbU1j0lX_Jrq@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgci.bug.filing@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox