Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/11] drm/dp_mst: Fix PBN divider calculation for UHBR rates
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 15:58:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVdxMqEt5eu0ChRG@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZVdH6rwVHAWMTLuf@intel.com>

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 01:00:58PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 03:18:32PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > The current way of calculating the pbn_div value, the link BW per each
> > MTP slot, worked only for DP 1.4 link rates. Fix things up for UHBR
> > rates calculating with the correct channel coding efficiency based on
> > the link rate.
> > 
> > v2:
> > - Return the fractional pbn_div value from drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw().
> > 
> > Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> >  include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h           | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > index 000d05e80352a..3fbd5585d5e6c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > @@ -3585,14 +3585,18 @@ static int drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> >  fixed20_12 drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(const struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> >  				    int link_rate, int link_lane_count)
> >  {
> > +	int ch_coding_efficiency =
> > +		drm_dp_bw_channel_coding_efficiency(drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(link_rate));
> >  	fixed20_12 ret;
> >  
> >  	if (link_rate == 0 || link_lane_count == 0)
> >  		drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "invalid link rate/lane count: (%d / %d)\n",
> >  			    link_rate, link_lane_count);
> >  
> > -	/* See DP v2.0 2.6.4.2, VCPayload_Bandwidth_for_OneTimeSlotPer_MTP_Allocation */
> > -	ret.full = dfixed_const(link_rate * link_lane_count / 54000);
> > +	/* See DP v2.0 2.6.4.2, 2.7.6.3 VCPayload_Bandwidth_for_OneTimeSlotPer_MTP_Allocation */
> > +	ret.full = DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(mul_u32_u32(link_rate * link_lane_count,
> > +						  ch_coding_efficiency),
> > +				      (1000000ULL * 8 * 5400) >> 12);
> 
> Seems to produce the correct numbers.
> 
> >  
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -4315,6 +4319,7 @@ int drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> >  	struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload = NULL;
> >  	struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
> >  	int prev_slots = 0, prev_bw = 0, req_slots;
> > +	fixed20_12 req_slots_fp;
> >  
> >  	topology_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, mgr);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(topology_state))
> > @@ -4342,7 +4347,9 @@ int drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	req_slots = DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn, dfixed_trunc(topology_state->pbn_div));
> > +	req_slots_fp.full = dfixed_div((fixed20_12)dfixed_init(pbn), topology_state->pbn_div);
> 
> dfixed_div() looks super dodgy. It seems to have some kind of hand
> rolled round to closest behaviour, which would imply that this can
> return a rounded down result.

Yes, dfixed_ceil(dfixed_div(..)) doesn't actually round up the result,
thanks for spotting that. It should be instead:

	req_slots = DIV_ROUND_UP(dfixed_const(pbn), topology_state->pbn_div.full);

Fixing the division similarly in patch 8.

> 
> > +	req_slots_fp.full = dfixed_ceil(req_slots_fp);
> > +	req_slots = dfixed_trunc(req_slots_fp);
> >  
> >  	drm_dbg_atomic(mgr->dev, "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] [MST PORT:%p] TU %d -> %d\n",
> >  		       port->connector->base.id, port->connector->name,
> > diff --git a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h
> > index c5f1079acb3b1..863b2e7add29e 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h
> > @@ -252,6 +252,19 @@ drm_edp_backlight_supported(const u8 edp_dpcd[EDP_DISPLAY_CTL_CAP_SIZE])
> >  	return !!(edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_TCON_BACKLIGHT_ADJUSTMENT_CAP);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate - Determine if a link rate is UHBR
> > + * @link_rate: link rate in 10kbits/s units
> > + *
> > + * Determine if the provided link rate is an UHBR rate.
> > + *
> > + * Returns: %True if @link_rate is an UHBR rate.
> > + */
> > +static inline bool drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(int link_rate)
> > +{
> > +	return link_rate >= 1000000;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * DisplayPort AUX channel
> >   */
> > -- 
> > 2.39.2
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-17 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-16 13:18 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/11] drm/i915: Fix UHBR data, link M/N/TU and PBN values Imre Deak
2023-11-16 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/11] drm/dp_mst: Store the MST PBN divider value in fixed point format Imre Deak
2023-11-17 10:56   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-17 14:11     ` Imre Deak
2023-11-21 13:54   ` Imre Deak
2023-11-16 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/11] drm/dp_mst: Fix PBN divider calculation for UHBR rates Imre Deak
2023-11-17 11:00   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-17 13:58     ` Imre Deak [this message]
2023-11-17 15:09   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2023-11-17 16:21     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-17 19:40       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-21 13:39         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2023-11-16 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/dp_mst: Add kunit tests for drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw() Imre Deak
2023-11-17 11:04   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-17 14:35     ` Imre Deak
2023-11-17 15:09   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2023-11-17 15:27     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 " Imre Deak
2023-11-17 16:18       ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-20 12:52       ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 " Imre Deak
2023-11-18 23:41   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " kernel test robot
2023-11-16 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/11] drm/i915/dp: Replace intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate() with drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate() Imre Deak
2023-11-17  3:21   ` Murthy, Arun R
2023-11-16 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/11] drm/i915/dp: Account for channel coding efficiency on UHBR links Imre Deak
2023-11-16 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/11] drm/i915/dp: Fix UHBR link M/N values Imre Deak
2023-11-16 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/11] drm/i915/dp_mst: Calculate the BW overhead in intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp() Imre Deak
2023-11-17  9:18   ` Murthy, Arun R
2023-11-16 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/11] drm/i915/dp_mst: Fix PBN / MTP_TU size calculation for UHBR rates Imre Deak
2023-11-17 15:09   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2023-11-16 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/11] drm/i915/dp: Report a rounded-down value as the maximum data rate Imre Deak
2023-11-17 11:43   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-11-16 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/11] drm/i915/dp: Simplify intel_dp_max_data_rate() Imre Deak
2023-11-17 17:10   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-16 13:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/11] drm/i915/dp: Reuse intel_dp_{max, effective}_data_rate in intel_link_compute_m_n() Imre Deak
2023-11-17 17:11   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-16 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Fix UHBR data, link M/N/TU and PBN values Patchwork
2023-11-16 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-11-16 17:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-11-17 14:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-17 20:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Fix UHBR data, link M/N/TU and PBN values (rev5) Patchwork
2023-11-17 20:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-11-17 20:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-11-18 17:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2023-11-20 12:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/11] drm/i915: Fix UHBR data, link M/N/TU and PBN values Jani Nikula
2023-11-20 13:10   ` Imre Deak
2023-11-20 13:36     ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-21  2:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Fix UHBR data, link M/N/TU and PBN values (rev6) Patchwork
2023-11-21  2:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-11-21  2:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-11-21 20:54   ` Imre Deak
2023-11-21 22:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/11] drm/i915: Fix UHBR data, link M/N/TU and PBN values Lyude Paul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZVdxMqEt5eu0ChRG@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox