Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: don't make assumptions about intel_wakeref_t type

[Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>]

Hi Jani,

On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> intel_wakeref_t is supposed to be a mostly opaque cookie to its
> users. It should only be checked for being non-zero and set to
> zero. Debug logging its actual value is meaningless. Switch to just
> debug logging whether the async_put_wakeref is non-zero.
> 
> The issue dates back to much earlier than
> commit b49e894c3fd8 ("drm/i915: Replace custom intel runtime_pm tracker
> with ref_tracker library"), but this is the one that brought about a
> build failure due to the printf format.
> 
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240102111222.2db11208@canb.auug.org.au
> Fixes: b49e894c3fd8 ("drm/i915: Replace custom intel runtime_pm tracker with ref_tracker library")
> Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>

Andi