From: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/opregion: abstract getting the opregion VBT
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:22:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaB4SOuGeQdUYjgj@invictus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8205b8fa724f98bbf1f76c59e661909d874e843e.1704992868.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 07:21:16PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Add a function to get the opregion VBT instead of accessing the opregion
> structures directly.
>
> Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Looks clean,
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.h | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index cf8e6f7bd490..5f04e495fd27 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -3073,7 +3073,7 @@ static struct vbt_header *oprom_get_vbt(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> */
> void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> - const struct vbt_header *vbt = i915->display.opregion.vbt;
> + const struct vbt_header *vbt;
> struct vbt_header *oprom_vbt = NULL;
> const struct bdb_header *bdb;
>
> @@ -3088,6 +3088,8 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>
> init_vbt_defaults(i915);
>
> + vbt = intel_opregion_get_vbt(i915, NULL);
> +
> /*
> * If the OpRegion does not have VBT, look in SPI flash through MMIO or
> * PCI mapping
> @@ -3305,7 +3307,7 @@ bool intel_bios_is_lvds_present(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 *i2c_pin)
> * additional data. Trust that if the VBT was written into
> * the OpRegion then they have validated the LVDS's existence.
> */
> - if (i915->display.opregion.vbt)
> + if (intel_opregion_get_vbt(i915, NULL))
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -3660,14 +3662,16 @@ void intel_bios_for_each_encoder(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> static int intel_bios_vbt_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = m->private;
> - struct intel_opregion *opregion = &i915->display.opregion;
> + const void *vbt;
> + size_t vbt_size;
>
> /*
> * FIXME: VBT might originate from other places than opregion, and then
> * this would be incorrect.
> */
> - if (opregion->vbt)
> - seq_write(m, opregion->vbt, opregion->vbt_size);
> + vbt = intel_opregion_get_vbt(i915, &vbt_size);
> + if (vbt)
> + seq_write(m, vbt, vbt_size);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c
> index 26c92ab4ee8a..8b9e820971cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.c
> @@ -1132,6 +1132,19 @@ const struct drm_edid *intel_opregion_get_edid(struct intel_connector *intel_con
> return drm_edid;
> }
>
> +const void *intel_opregion_get_vbt(struct drm_i915_private *i915, size_t *size)
> +{
> + struct intel_opregion *opregion = &i915->display.opregion;
> +
> + if (!opregion->vbt)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (size)
> + *size = opregion->vbt_size;
> +
> + return opregion->vbt;
> +}
> +
> bool intel_opregion_headless_sku(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> struct intel_opregion *opregion = &i915->display.opregion;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.h
> index 7177f50ab0d3..9efadfb72584 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_opregion.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ int intel_opregion_notify_adapter(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> int intel_opregion_get_panel_type(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> const struct drm_edid *intel_opregion_get_edid(struct intel_connector *connector);
>
> +const void *intel_opregion_get_vbt(struct drm_i915_private *i915, size_t *size);
> +
> bool intel_opregion_headless_sku(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>
> void intel_opregion_debugfs_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> @@ -136,6 +138,12 @@ intel_opregion_get_edid(struct intel_connector *connector)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static inline const void *
> +intel_opregion_get_vbt(struct drm_i915_private *i915, size_t *size)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool intel_opregion_headless_sku(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> return false;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-11 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-11 17:21 [PATCH 0/6] drm/i915/opregion: better abstractions Jani Nikula
2024-01-11 17:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/bios: move i915_vbt debugfs to intel_bios.c Jani Nikula
2024-01-11 23:11 ` Radhakrishna Sripada
2024-01-11 17:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/opregion: move i915_opregion debugfs to intel_opregion.c Jani Nikula
2024-01-11 23:20 ` Radhakrishna Sripada
2024-01-11 17:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/opregion: abstract getting the opregion VBT Jani Nikula
2024-01-11 23:22 ` Radhakrishna Sripada [this message]
2024-01-11 17:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/opregion: abstract ASLE presence check Jani Nikula
2024-01-12 0:03 ` Radhakrishna Sripada
2024-01-12 10:17 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-12 19:36 ` Radhakrishna Sripada
2024-01-15 13:48 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-16 9:57 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-11 17:21 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/gvt: use local INTEL_GVT_OPREGION_SIZE Jani Nikula
2024-01-12 0:15 ` Radhakrishna Sripada
2024-01-11 17:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/opregion: make struct intel_opregion opaque Jani Nikula
2024-01-12 0:13 ` Radhakrishna Sripada
2024-01-17 11:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-01-17 12:43 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-11 18:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/opregion: better abstractions Patchwork
2024-01-11 18:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-01-15 14:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/opregion: better abstractions (rev2) Patchwork
2024-01-15 14:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-01-15 16:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZaB4SOuGeQdUYjgj@invictus \
--to=radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox