From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: <John.C.Harrison@intel.com>
Cc: <Intel-GFX@lists.freedesktop.org>, <DRI-Devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/guc: Simplify/extend platform check for Wa_14018913170
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:28:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZdO52xFiDGrfJ_cd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240216183841.497768-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 10:38:41AM -0800, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>
> The above w/a is required for every platform that the i915 driver
> supports. It is fixed on the latest platforms but they are only
> supported by Xe instead of i915. So just remove the platform check
> completely and keep the code simple.
Well, I was going to say that I would prefer a GMD version greater-than
check to be future proof. However if this code gets used in some other
new platform a new specific guc support would likely need to be added
as well right?
Perhaps at least adding a comment in the code?
with that
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
> index 2b450c43bbd7f..a3662edb42032 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
> @@ -321,8 +321,7 @@ static u32 guc_ctl_wa_flags(struct intel_guc *guc)
>
> /* Wa_14018913170 */
> if (GUC_FIRMWARE_VER(guc) >= MAKE_GUC_VER(70, 7, 0)) {
> - if (IS_DG2(gt->i915) || IS_METEORLAKE(gt->i915) || IS_PONTEVECCHIO(gt->i915))
> - flags |= GUC_WA_ENABLE_TSC_CHECK_ON_RC6;
> + flags |= GUC_WA_ENABLE_TSC_CHECK_ON_RC6;
> }
>
> return flags;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-16 18:38 [PATCH v3] drm/i915/guc: Simplify/extend platform check for Wa_14018913170 John.C.Harrison
2024-02-17 0:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2024-02-17 18:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-02-19 20:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-02-20 19:52 ` [PATCH v3] " John Harrison
2024-02-20 22:03 ` Rodrigo Vivi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-23 20:28 John.C.Harrison
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZdO52xFiDGrfJ_cd@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=DRI-Devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=Intel-GFX@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox