Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/scaler: Update Pipe src size check for DISPLAY_VER >= 12
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 17:26:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zec5l8v6OAJCqYZs@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240219055255.1099867-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:22:55AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> For Earlier platforms, the Pipe source size is 12-bits so
> max pipe source width and height is 4096. For newer platforms it is
> 13-bits so theoretically max height is 8192, but maximum width
> supported on a single pipe is 5120, beyond which we need to use
> bigjoiner.
> 
> Currently we are using max scaler source size to make sure that the
> pipe source size is programmed within limits, before using scaler.
> This creates a problem, for MTL where scaler source size is 4096, but
> max pipe source width can be 5120.
> 
> Update the check to use the aforementioned limits.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
> index 8a934bada624..36342142efaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ skl_update_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, bool force_detach,
>  	int pipe_src_h = drm_rect_height(&crtc_state->pipe_src);
>  	int min_src_w, min_src_h, min_dst_w, min_dst_h;
>  	int max_src_w, max_src_h, max_dst_w, max_dst_h;
> +	int max_pipe_src_w, max_pipe_src_h;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Src coordinates are already rotated by 270 degrees for
> @@ -212,11 +213,21 @@ skl_update_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, bool force_detach,
>  	/*
>  	 * The pipe scaler does not use all the bits of PIPESRC, at least
>  	 * on the earlier platforms. So even when we're scaling a plane
> -	 * the *pipe* source size must not be too large. For simplicity
> -	 * we assume the limits match the scaler source size limits. Might
> -	 * not be 100% accurate on all platforms, but good enough for now.
> +	 * the *pipe* source size must not be too large.
> +	 *
> +	 * For Earlier platforms, the Pipe source size is 12-bits so
> +	 * max pipe src width and height is 4096. For newer platforms it is 13-bits.
> +	 * Theoretically maximum pipe src height supported on a single pipe is 8192,
> +	 * but maximum pipe src width supported on a single pipe is 5120.
>  	 */
> -	if (pipe_src_w > max_src_w || pipe_src_h > max_src_h) {
> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12) {
> +		max_pipe_src_w = 4096;
> +		max_pipe_src_h = 4096;

That doesn't seem right.

Hmm. We should probably we able to just switch this to check 
against the max dst size instead of the max src size.

> +	} else {
> +		max_pipe_src_w = 5120;
> +		max_pipe_src_h = 8192;
> +	}
> +	if (pipe_src_w > max_pipe_src_w || pipe_src_h > max_pipe_src_h) {
>  		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
>  			    "scaler_user index %u.%u: pipe src size %ux%u "
>  			    "is out of scaler range\n",
> -- 
> 2.40.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-05 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-19  5:52 [PATCH] drm/i915/scaler: Update Pipe src size check for DISPLAY_VER >= 12 Ankit Nautiyal
2024-02-19  6:59 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2024-02-19  8:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2024-03-05 15:26 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-03-06 12:58   ` [PATCH] " Nautiyal, Ankit K

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zec5l8v6OAJCqYZs@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox