From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Luca Coelho" <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] drm/i915/display: rename __intel_wait_for_register_nowl() to indicate intel_de_
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:59:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh_VpLLkuxZ3k5lW@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <967d3fc67a9053f7d5f9c03010fd5f94dc8d547d.1713358679.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 04:02:44PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Rename __intel_wait_for_register_nowl() to
> __intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl() to be in line with the rest of
> intel_de.h.
>
> Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
> index 0a0fba81e7af..4b51388c6041 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
> @@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ intel_de_rmw(struct drm_i915_private *i915, i915_reg_t reg, u32 clear, u32 set)
> }
>
> static inline int
> -__intel_wait_for_register_nowl(struct drm_i915_private *i915, i915_reg_t reg,
> - u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout)
> +__intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(struct drm_i915_private *i915, i915_reg_t reg,
> + u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout)
> {
> return intel_wait_for_register(&i915->uncore, reg, mask,
> value, timeout);
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ intel_de_wait(struct drm_i915_private *i915, i915_reg_t reg,
>
> intel_dmc_wl_get(i915, reg);
>
> - ret = __intel_wait_for_register_nowl(i915, reg, mask, value, timeout);
> + ret = __intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(i915, reg, mask, value, timeout);
>
> intel_dmc_wl_put(i915, reg);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
> index 30f8905fae41..162de0d20554 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
> @@ -77,9 +77,9 @@ static void intel_dmc_wl_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> __intel_de_rmw_nowl(i915, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL, DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_REQ, 0);
>
> - if (__intel_wait_for_register_nowl(i915, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL,
> - DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK, 0,
> - DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT)) {
> + if (__intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(i915, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL,
> + DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK, 0,
> + DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT)) {
> WARN_RATELIMIT(1, "DMC wakelock release timed out");
> goto out_unlock;
> }
> @@ -216,10 +216,10 @@ void intel_dmc_wl_get(struct drm_i915_private *i915, i915_reg_t reg)
> __intel_de_rmw_nowl(i915, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL, 0,
> DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_REQ);
>
> - if (__intel_wait_for_register_nowl(i915, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL,
> - DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK,
> - DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK,
> - DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT)) {
> + if (__intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl(i915, DMC_WAKELOCK1_CTL,
> + DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK,
> + DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_ACK,
> + DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT)) {
> WARN_RATELIMIT(1, "DMC wakelock ack timed out");
> goto out_unlock;
> }
> --
> 2.39.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-17 13:02 [PATCH v4 0/9] drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] drm/i915/display: add intel_display -> drm_device backpointer Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] drm/i915/display: add generic to_intel_display() macro Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] drm/i915: add generic __to_intel_display() Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] drm/i915/display: accept either i915 or display for feature tests Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] drm/i915/quirks: convert struct drm_i915_private to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] drm/i915/display: rename __intel_wait_for_register_nowl() to indicate intel_de_ Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 13:59 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] drm/i915/dmc: convert dmc wakelock interface to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 14:31 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] drm/i915/de: allow intel_display and drm_i915_private for de functions Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 14:00 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] drm/i915/dmc: use struct intel_display more Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 14:31 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-18 18:21 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-17 14:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: better high level abstraction for display (rev3) Patchwork
2024-04-17 14:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-04-17 14:38 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-18 11:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zh_VpLLkuxZ3k5lW@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox