Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Calculate crtc clock rate based on PLL parameters
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 14:00:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjTDwXmdSPALPU/l@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240502131716.504616-1-mika.kahola@intel.com>

On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 04:17:16PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> With HDMI monitors we bumped up a case where the crtc clock rate
> caused a mismatch on state verification. This was due to
> assumption that the SW clock rate from PLL structure would match
> the calculated counterpart from HW. This is not necessarily always
> the case and therefore we would actually need to recalculate the
> clock rate from SW PLL parameters. Then these SW and HW crtc clock
> rates can be compared with each other.
> 
> The patch recalculates the crtc clock rate for SW state based on
> SW PLL parameters and compares the crtc clock rate calculated
> from the parameters found from the HW.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> index 8e3b13884bb8..89a195917179 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
> @@ -3078,9 +3078,10 @@ static void intel_c20pll_state_verify(const struct intel_crtc_state *state,
>  	const struct intel_c20pll_state *mpll_sw_state = &state->dpll_hw_state.cx0pll.c20;
>  	bool sw_use_mpllb = intel_c20phy_use_mpllb(mpll_sw_state);
>  	bool hw_use_mpllb = intel_c20phy_use_mpllb(mpll_hw_state);
> +	int clock = intel_c20pll_calc_port_clock(encoder, mpll_sw_state);
>  	int i;
>  
> -	I915_STATE_WARN(i915, mpll_hw_state->clock != mpll_sw_state->clock,
> +	I915_STATE_WARN(i915, mpll_hw_state->clock != clock,

There is a corresponding check already in the encoder state checker,
which is more approriate, since it compares the calculated PLL clock
against the - adjusted - crtc port clock and I think that's the only
place all other platforms check this. In any case the above check
looks correct:

Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

>  			"[CRTC:%d:%s] mismatch in C20: Register CLOCK (expected %d, found %d)",
>  			crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name,
>  			mpll_sw_state->clock, mpll_hw_state->clock);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-03 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-02 13:17 [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Calculate crtc clock rate based on PLL parameters Mika Kahola
2024-05-02 14:03 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2024-05-03  0:20 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2024-05-03 11:00 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2024-05-06  7:45   ` [PATCH] " Kahola, Mika

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZjTDwXmdSPALPU/l@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mika.kahola@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox