From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@intel.com,
jouni.hogander@intel.com, arun.r.murthy@intel.com,
mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] drm/i915/panelreplay: Panel replay workaround with VRR
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:01:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnLWjdUXvxGz8Bux@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240618112215.2892017-1-animesh.manna@intel.com>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 04:52:15PM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
> Panel Replay VSC SDP not getting sent when VRR is enabled
> and W1 and W2 are 0. So Program Set Context Latency in
> TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY register to at least a value of 1.
>
> HSD: 14015406119
>
> v1: Initial version.
> v2: Update timings stored in adjusted_mode struct. [Ville]
> v3: Add WA in compute_config(). [Ville]
> v4:
> - Add DISPLAY_VER() check and improve code comment. [Rodrigo]
> - Introduce centralized intel_crtc_vblank_delay(). [Ville]
> v5: Move to crtc_compute_config(). [Ville]
> v6: Restrict DISPLAY_VER till 14. [Mitul]
> v7:
> - Corrected code-comment. [Mitul]
> - dev_priv local variable removed. [Jani]
>
> Reviewed-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 7bc4f3de691e..c3ff3a5c5fa3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -2515,6 +2515,10 @@ static int intel_crtc_compute_config(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> int ret;
>
> + /* wa_14015401596: display versions 13, 14 */
> + if (IS_DISPLAY_VER(to_i915(crtc->base.dev), 13, 14))
> + intel_crtc_vblank_delay(crtc_state);
> +
> ret = intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock(state, crtc);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -3924,6 +3928,23 @@ bool intel_crtc_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> return true;
> }
>
> +void intel_crtc_vblank_delay(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> +
> + /*
> + * wa_14015401596 for display versions 13, 14.
> + * Program Set Context Latency in TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY register
> + * to at least a value of 1 when Panel Replay is enabled with VRR.
> + * Value for TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY is calculated by substracting
> + * crtc_vdisplay from crtc_vblank_start, so incrementing crtc_vblank_start
> + * by 1 if both are equal.
> + */
> + if (crtc_state->vrr.enable && crtc_state->has_panel_replay &&
> + adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start == adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay)
> + adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start += 1;
> +}
This is probably too late actually. We already used the previous value
to calculate the VRR guardband/pipeline full values, which may or may
not now be incorrect. So NAK for now until someone actually checks how
it all works (I don't recall the details right now).
> +
> int intel_dotclock_calculate(int link_freq,
> const struct intel_link_m_n *m_n)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> index b0cf6ca70952..f99a24e76608 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> @@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ bool intel_crtc_is_joiner_primary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> u8 intel_crtc_joiner_secondary_pipes(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> struct intel_crtc *intel_primary_crtc(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> bool intel_crtc_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> +void intel_crtc_vblank_delay(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> bool intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> bool fastset);
> --
> 2.29.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-18 11:22 [PATCH v7] drm/i915/panelreplay: Panel replay workaround with VRR Animesh Manna
2024-06-18 12:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/panelreplay: Panel replay workaround with VRR (rev7) Patchwork
2024-06-18 20:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2024-06-19 13:01 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-06-20 17:35 ` [PATCH v7] drm/i915/panelreplay: Panel replay workaround with VRR Ville Syrjälä
2024-06-21 5:55 ` Manna, Animesh
2024-06-24 13:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZnLWjdUXvxGz8Bux@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox