From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com>,
Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Allow partial memory mapping for cpu memory
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 10:53:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZrXZEpplb6YA9T_d@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240807100521.478266-1-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 11:05:19AM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series concludes on the memory mapping fixes and
> improvements by allowing partial memory mapping for the cpu
> memory as well.
>
> The partial memory mapping by adding an object offset was
> implicitely included in commit 8bdd9ef7e9b1 ("drm/i915/gem: Fix
> Virtual Memory mapping boundaries calculation") for the gtt
> memory.
Does userspace actually care? Do we have a flag or something, so that
userspace can discover this?
Adding complexity of any kind is absolute no-go, unless there's a
userspace need. This also includes the gtt accidental fix.
-Sima
>
> Andi
>
> Andi Shyti (2):
> drm/i915/gem: Do not look for the exact address in node
> drm/i915/gem: Calculate object page offset for partial memory mapping
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 10 ++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mm.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mm.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-09 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-07 10:05 [PATCH 0/2] Allow partial memory mapping for cpu memory Andi Shyti
2024-08-07 10:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gem: Do not look for the exact address in node Andi Shyti
2024-08-08 16:11 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-07 10:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gem: Calculate object page offset for partial memory mapping Andi Shyti
2024-08-08 16:11 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-08-07 11:13 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Allow partial memory mapping for cpu memory Patchwork
2024-08-07 22:30 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-08-08 0:10 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Allow partial memory mapping for cpu memory (rev2) Patchwork
2024-08-08 7:32 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-08-09 8:53 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2024-08-09 10:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] Allow partial memory mapping for cpu memory Andi Shyti
2024-08-12 9:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2024-08-12 11:51 ` Andi Shyti
2024-08-12 14:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2024-08-13 2:54 ` Matthew Brost
2024-08-13 14:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2024-08-13 19:08 ` Matthew Brost
2024-08-14 2:08 ` Matthew Brost
2024-08-19 14:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2024-08-19 15:31 ` Andi Shyti
2024-08-22 9:29 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZrXZEpplb6YA9T_d@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox