Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com>,
	Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
	Krzysztof Niemiec <krzysztof.niemiec@intel.com>,
	Sima <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Allow partial memory mapping for cpu memory
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:51:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zry2d2LtQLiPY58x@ashyti-mobl2.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240814134837.116498-1-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>

Argh... sorry, I messed up with format-patch and send-mail and
sent it twice.

Maybe I need to resend it if CI complains.

Andi

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 03:48:32PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am resending this patch series, not to disregard the previous
> discussions, but to ensure it gets tested with the IGTs that
> Krzysztof has provided.
> 
> This patch series finalizes the memory mapping fixes and
> improvements by enabling partial memory mapping for CPU memory as
> well.
> 
> The concept of partial memory mapping, achieved by adding an
> object offset, was implicitly introduced in commit 8bdd9ef7e9b1
> ("drm/i915/gem: Fix Virtual Memory mapping boundaries
> calculation") for GTT memory.
> 
> To address a previous discussion with Sima and Matt, this feature
> is used by Mesa and is required across all platforms utilizing
> Mesa. Although Nirmoy suggested using the Fixes tag to backport
> this to previous kernels, I view this as a new feature rather
> than a fix.
> 
> Lionel, please let me know if you have a different perspective
> and believe this should be treated as a bug fix, requiring it
> to be backported to stable kernels.
> 
> The IGTs have been developed in collaboration with the Mesa team
> to replicate the exact Mesa use case[*].
> 
> Thanks Chris for the support, thanks Krzysztof for taking care of
> the IGT tests, thanks Nirmoy for your reviews and thanks Sima and
> Matt for the discussion on this series.
> 
> Andi
> 
> [*] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/608232/?series=137303&rev=1
> 
> Test-with: 20240814132404.18392-1-krzysztof.niemiec@intel.com
> 
> Changelog:
> ==========
> v1 -> v2
>  - Added Nirmoy's tags.
> 
> Andi Shyti (2):
>   drm/i915/gem: Do not look for the exact address in node
>   drm/i915/gem: Calculate object page offset for partial memory mapping
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 10 ++++++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mm.c           | 12 +++++++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mm.h           |  3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.45.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-14 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-14 13:48 [PATCH v2 0/2] Allow partial memory mapping for cpu memory Andi Shyti
2024-08-14 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/gem: Do not look for the exact address in node Andi Shyti
2024-08-14 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/gem: Calculate object page offset for partial memory mapping Andi Shyti
2024-08-14 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Allow partial memory mapping for cpu memory Andi Shyti
2024-08-14 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/gem: Do not look for the exact address in node Andi Shyti
2024-08-14 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/gem: Calculate object page offset for partial memory mapping Andi Shyti
2024-08-14 13:51 ` Andi Shyti [this message]
2024-08-14 14:49 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Allow partial memory mapping for cpu memory Patchwork
2024-08-14 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Matthew Brost
2024-08-19 15:16   ` Andi Shyti
2024-08-19 16:53     ` Matthew Brost
2024-08-22  9:49       ` Daniel Vetter
2024-08-14 18:29 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
2024-08-14 22:12 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Allow partial memory mapping for cpu memory (rev2) Patchwork
2024-08-16  5:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-14 13:47 [PATCH v2 0/2] Allow partial memory mapping for cpu memory Andi Shyti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zry2d2LtQLiPY58x@ashyti-mobl2.lan \
    --to=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.niemiec@intel.com \
    --cc=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox