Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/bios: Extract vbt_signature[]
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:59:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zu2p3dlneXYbmWEu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y13xf4p3.fsf@intel.com>

On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 03:15:52PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2024, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Replace the three hand rolled "$VBT"s with a vbt_signature[]
> > to avoid accidents.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 12 +++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > index cbbda94c3dab..0b92b494117f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > @@ -2964,6 +2964,8 @@ static const struct bdb_header *get_bdb_header(const struct vbt_header *vbt)
> >  	return _vbt + vbt->bdb_offset;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static const char vbt_signature[4] = "$VBT";
> 
> Always a bit scary to add strings without termination, but I guess it's
> justified here.

I guess we could make it look less like a string with eg.
static const u8 vbt_signature[] = { '$', 'V', 'B', 'T' };
?

> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> 
> 
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * intel_bios_is_valid_vbt - does the given buffer contain a valid VBT
> >   * @display:	display device
> > @@ -2986,7 +2988,7 @@ bool intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
> >  		return false;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (memcmp(vbt->signature, "$VBT", 4)) {
> > +	if (memcmp(vbt->signature, vbt_signature, sizeof(vbt_signature))) {
> >  		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "VBT invalid signature\n");
> >  		return false;
> >  	}
> > @@ -3082,9 +3084,11 @@ static struct vbt_header *spi_oprom_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
> >  	oprom_offset = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore, OROM_OFFSET);
> >  	oprom_offset &= OROM_OFFSET_MASK;
> >  
> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(vbt_signature) != sizeof(u32));
> > +
> >  	for (count = 0; count < oprom_size; count += 4) {
> >  		data = intel_spi_read32(&i915->uncore, oprom_offset + count);
> > -		if (data == *((const u32 *)"$VBT")) {
> > +		if (data == *((const u32 *)vbt_signature)) {
> >  			found = oprom_offset + count;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> > @@ -3144,9 +3148,11 @@ static struct vbt_header *oprom_get_vbt(struct intel_display *display,
> >  	if (!oprom)
> >  		return NULL;
> >  
> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(vbt_signature) != sizeof(u32));
> > +
> >  	/* Scour memory looking for the VBT signature. */
> >  	for (i = 0; i + 4 < size; i += 4) {
> > -		if (ioread32(oprom + i) != *((const u32 *)"$VBT"))
> > +		if (ioread32(oprom + i) != *((const u32 *)vbt_signature))
> >  			continue;
> >  
> >  		p = oprom + i;
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-20 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-10 13:42 [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/bios: Refactor ROM access Ville Syrjala
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/bios: Add some size checks to SPI VBT read Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 11:56   ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/bios: Round PCI ROM VBT allocation to multiple of 4 Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 11:57   ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/bios: Extract intel_spi_read16() Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 12:02   ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 17:00     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/bios: Extract vbt_signature[] Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 12:15   ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 16:59     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-09-23  9:12       ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-23 14:22         ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 14:24           ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-23 14:29             ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-10 13:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/bios: Extract soc/intel_rom.c Ville Syrjala
2024-09-12 12:44   ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-20 17:02     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23  9:13       ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-10 17:29 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/bios: Refactor ROM access Patchwork
2024-09-10 17:29 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-09-10 17:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-11  9:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zu2p3dlneXYbmWEu@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox