From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
<chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/rc6: Disable RPG during workload execution
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:48:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxkMo6BVeb7xvhs2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c94a44fc-0211-4b83-9faa-cb8d0765f76e@intel.com>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:03:57AM +0530, Nilawar, Badal wrote:
>
>
> On 22-10-2024 22:39, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 03:28:43PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > > Hi Badal,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 06:52:26PM +0530, Badal Nilawar wrote:
> > > > Encountering forcewake errors related to render power gating;
> > >
> > > Can you please expand your explanation here?
> >
> > yeap. More explanation please. All platforms? really?
>
> We are seeing Render forcewake timeouts on ADLP, ADLM, ADLN, TWL, DG1, rpl.
Is this a regression? or a new issue?
Is this happening with Xe on these platforms? or i915 only?
> Issue disappears after disabling RPG. Instead of fully disabling RPG I am
> disabling it during active submissions i.e. during unpark.
> For MTL and ARL RPG is already disabled permanently.
uhm. Interesting. Why that is disabled on these platforms? perhaps we should be
doing the same for all GuC enabled platforms?
>
> Impact of doing this change should be performance improvement so kept for
> all platform otherwise I will add platform check.
it could cause power consumption and battery life regressions. Better to filter
per platform.
>
> This is the issue https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/9413. Will
> add it in commit message.
Next time please include the relevant links in the commit msg.
Thanks a lot for the info and for working on this,
Rodrigo.
>
> Regards,
> Badal
>
> >
> > >
> > > > therefore, disable it during workload execution.
> > >
> > > ... and here.
> > >
> > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rc6.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rc6_types.h | 1 +
> > > > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rc6.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rc6.c
> > > > index c864d101faf9..459394ab5258 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rc6.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rc6.c
> > > > @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ static void gen11_rc6_enable(struct intel_rc6 *rc6)
> > > > VDN_MFX_POWERGATE_ENABLE(i));
> > > > }
> > > > + rc6->pg_enable = pg_enable;
> > >
> > > this looks borderline racy, it's fine only because this function
> > > is called during resume which normally runs in atomic context.
> > >
> > > > intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GEN9_PG_ENABLE, pg_enable);
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -572,8 +573,11 @@ static void __intel_rc6_disable(struct intel_rc6 *rc6)
> > > > intel_guc_rc_disable(gt_to_guc(gt));
> > > > intel_uncore_forcewake_get(uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> > > > - if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 9)
> > > > + if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 9) {
> > > > + rc6->pg_enable = 0;
> > > > intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GEN9_PG_ENABLE, 0);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GEN6_RC_CONTROL, 0);
> > > > intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GEN6_RC_STATE, 0);
> > > > intel_uncore_forcewake_put(uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> > > > @@ -687,6 +691,15 @@ void intel_rc6_unpark(struct intel_rc6 *rc6)
> > > > /* Restore HW timers for automatic RC6 entry while busy */
> > > > intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GEN6_RC_CONTROL, rc6->ctl_enable);
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Seeing render forcewake timeouts during active submissions so disable render PG
> > > > + * while workloads are under execution.
> > >
> > > Can you please improve this sentence? If I never new about the
> > > issue I would be a bit confused.
> > >
> > > > + * FIXME Remove this change once real cause of render force wake timeout is fixed
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (rc6->pg_enable == GEN9_RENDER_PG_ENABLE)
> > >
> > > is this supposed to be "pg_enable == GEN9_RENDER_PG_ENABLE" or
> > > "pg_enable & GEN9_RENDER_PG_ENABLE" ?
> > >
> > > Andi
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-23 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-22 13:22 [PATCH] drm/i915/rc6: Disable RPG during workload execution Badal Nilawar
2024-10-22 13:28 ` Andi Shyti
2024-10-22 17:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-10-23 5:33 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-23 14:48 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-10-23 16:01 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-23 16:11 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-24 14:28 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2024-10-24 17:34 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-10-24 19:06 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-22 14:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for " Patchwork
2024-10-22 14:10 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-22 19:28 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxkMo6BVeb7xvhs2@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox