Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] x86/mm: Fix PAT bit missing from page protection modify mask
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 08:31:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a20344fd-8130-013e-e773-acae81aad55a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230607152308.125787-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>

On 6/7/23 08:23, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> 
> Extend bitmask used by pgprot_modify() for selecting bits to be preserved
> with _PAGE_PAT bit.  However, since that bit can be reused as _PAGE_PSE,
> and the _PAGE_CHG_MASK symbol, primarly used by pte_modify(), is likely
> intentionally defined with that bit not set, keep that symbol unchanged.

I'm really having a hard time parsing what that last sentence is saying.

Could you try again, please?

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-07 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-07 15:23 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] x86/mm: Fix PAT bit missing from page protection modify mask Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-06-07 15:31 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2023-06-07 17:11   ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-06-07 21:12     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-07 21:33       ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-06-07 22:47         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-08 13:19           ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-06-08  5:15       ` Juergen Gross
2023-06-07 23:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for x86/mm: Fix PAT bit missing from page protection modify mask (rev2) Patchwork
2023-06-07 23:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-06-08 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a20344fd-8130-013e-e773-acae81aad55a@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox