From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, cunming.liang@intel.com,
zhihong.wang@intel.com, rob.miller@broadcom.com,
xiao.w.wang@intel.com, haotian.wang@sifive.com,
zhenyuw@linux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@intel.com,
jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
farman@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, sebott@linux.ibm.com,
oberpar@linux.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
gor@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/6] mdev: introduce virtio device and its device ops
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 18:57:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2a8e447-c778-59db-071a-ffa348a69bb8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191018094655.GA4200@___>
On 2019/10/18 下午5:46, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 06:48:34PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> + * @get_vq_state: Get the state for a virtqueue
>> + * @mdev: mediated device
>> + * @idx: virtqueue index
>> + * Returns virtqueue state (last_avail_idx)
>> + * @get_vq_align: Get the virtqueue align requirement
>> + * for the device
>> + * @mdev: mediated device
>> + * Returns virtqueue algin requirement
>> + * @get_features: Get virtio features supported by the device
>> + * @mdev: mediated device
>> + * Returns the virtio features support by the
>> + * device
>> + * @get_features: Set virtio features supported by the driver
> s/get_features/set_features/
Will fix.
>
>> + * configration space
>> + * @get_mdev_features: Get the feature of virtio mdev device
>> + * @mdev: mediated device
>> + * Returns the mdev features (API) support by
>> + * the device.
>> + * @get_generation: Get device generaton
>> + * @mdev: mediated device
>> + * Returns u32: device generation
>> + */
>> +struct virtio_mdev_device_ops {
>> + /* Virtqueue ops */
>> + int (*set_vq_address)(struct mdev_device *mdev,
>> + u16 idx, u64 desc_area, u64 driver_area,
>> + u64 device_area);
>> + void (*set_vq_num)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx, u32 num);
>> + void (*kick_vq)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx);
>> + void (*set_vq_cb)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx,
>> + struct virtio_mdev_callback *cb);
>> + void (*set_vq_ready)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx, bool ready);
>> + bool (*get_vq_ready)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx);
>> + int (*set_vq_state)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx, u64 state);
>> + u64 (*get_vq_state)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx);
>> +
>> + /* Device ops */
>> + u16 (*get_vq_align)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
>> + u64 (*get_features)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
>> + int (*set_features)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u64 features);
>> + void (*set_config_cb)(struct mdev_device *mdev,
>> + struct virtio_mdev_callback *cb);
>> + u16 (*get_vq_num_max)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
>> + u32 (*get_device_id)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
>> + u32 (*get_vendor_id)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
>> + u8 (*get_status)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
>> + void (*set_status)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u8 status);
>> + void (*get_config)(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int offset,
>> + void *buf, unsigned int len);
>> + void (*set_config)(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int offset,
>> + const void *buf, unsigned int len);
>> + u64 (*get_mdev_features)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
> Do we need a .set_mdev_features method as well?
Good question. To me I think we may document that the API provides
backward compatibility, so there's no need for set_mdev_features. Or is
there any other chance that we need that?
>
> It's not very clear what does mdev_features mean.
> Does it mean the vhost backend features?
>
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/0e2adab6cf285c41e825b6c74a3aa61324d1132c/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h#L93-L94
Something like this, it's kind of the version of the API, except for the
_F_VERSION_1, the first user should be _F_LOG_ALL. I will add more docs
for this API.
Thanks
>
>
>> + u32 (*get_generation)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
>> +};
>> +
>> +void mdev_set_virtio_ops(struct mdev_device *mdev,
>> + const struct virtio_mdev_device_ops *virtio_ops);
>> +
>> +#endif
>> --
>> 2.19.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-18 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-17 10:48 [PATCH V4 0/6] mdev based hardware virtio offloading support Jason Wang
2019-10-17 10:48 ` [PATCH V4 1/6] mdev: class id support Jason Wang
2019-10-20 23:25 ` Parav Pandit
2019-10-17 10:48 ` [PATCH V4 2/6] modpost: add support for mdev class id Jason Wang
2019-10-20 23:25 ` Parav Pandit
2019-10-17 10:48 ` [PATCH V4 3/6] mdev: introduce device specific ops Jason Wang
2019-10-17 15:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-17 17:53 ` Alex Williamson
2019-10-18 7:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-18 7:34 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-20 23:41 ` Parav Pandit
2019-10-21 6:02 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-17 10:48 ` [PATCH V4 4/6] mdev: introduce virtio device and its device ops Jason Wang
2019-10-17 17:53 ` Alex Williamson
2019-10-18 7:35 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-18 9:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-18 10:55 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-18 13:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-21 5:36 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-18 9:46 ` Tiwei Bie
2019-10-18 10:57 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2019-10-17 10:48 ` [PATCH V4 5/6] virtio: introduce a mdev based transport Jason Wang
2019-10-18 14:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-21 5:59 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-21 9:36 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-21 10:13 ` Jason Wang
2019-10-17 10:48 ` [PATCH V4 6/6] docs: sample driver to demonstrate how to implement virtio-mdev framework Jason Wang
2019-10-17 17:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for mdev based hardware virtio offloading support (rev5) Patchwork
2019-10-17 18:25 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-10-18 3:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2a8e447-c778-59db-071a-ffa348a69bb8@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=haotian.wang@sifive.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rob.miller@broadcom.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox