Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 20/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Async vm_unbind support

[Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>]

On 13/11/2022 07:57, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
> Asynchronously unbind the vma upon vm_unbind call.
> Fall back to synchronous unbind if backend doesn't support
> async unbind or if async unbind fails.
> 
> No need for vm_unbind out fence support as i915 will internally
> handle all sequencing and user need not try to sequence any
> operation with the unbind completion.
> 
> v2: use i915_vma_destroy_async in vm_unbind ioctl
> 
> Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>

This only does it for non-partial vma, right? Or was that changed somewhere?

Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>

> ---
>   .../drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c    |  2 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c               | 51 +++++++++++++++++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h               |  1 +
>   include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h                   |  3 +-
>   4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c
> index d87d1210365b..36651b447966 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static int i915_gem_vm_unbind_vma(struct i915_address_space *vm,
>   	 */
>   	obj = vma->obj;
>   	i915_gem_object_lock(obj, NULL);
> -	i915_vma_destroy(vma);
> +	i915_vma_destroy_async(vma);
>   	i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
>   
>   	i915_gem_object_put(obj);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
> index 7cf77c67d755..483d25f2425c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
>   #include "i915_vma.h"
>   #include "i915_vma_resource.h"
>   
> +static struct dma_fence *__i915_vma_unbind_async(struct i915_vma *vma);
> +
>   static inline void assert_vma_held_evict(const struct i915_vma *vma)
>   {
>   	/*
> @@ -1713,7 +1715,7 @@ void i915_vma_reopen(struct i915_vma *vma)
>   	spin_unlock_irq(&gt->closed_lock);
>   }
>   
> -static void force_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
> +static void force_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma, bool async)
>   {
>   	if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node))
>   		return;
> @@ -1727,7 +1729,21 @@ static void force_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
>   		i915_vma_set_purged(vma);
>   
>   	atomic_and(~I915_VMA_PIN_MASK, &vma->flags);
> -	WARN_ON(__i915_vma_unbind(vma));
> +	if (async) {
> +		struct dma_fence *fence;
> +
> +		fence = __i915_vma_unbind_async(vma);
> +		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fence)) {
> +			async = false;
> +		} else {
> +			dma_resv_add_fence(vma->obj->base.resv, fence,
> +					   DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ);
> +			dma_fence_put(fence);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!async)
> +		WARN_ON(__i915_vma_unbind(vma));
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node));
>   }
>   
> @@ -1787,7 +1803,7 @@ void i915_vma_destroy_locked(struct i915_vma *vma)
>   {
>   	lockdep_assert_held(&vma->vm->mutex);
>   
> -	force_unbind(vma);
> +	force_unbind(vma, false);
>   	list_del_init(&vma->vm_link);
>   	release_references(vma, vma->vm->gt, false);
>   }
> @@ -1798,7 +1814,34 @@ void i915_vma_destroy(struct i915_vma *vma)
>   	bool vm_ddestroy;
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&vma->vm->mutex);
> -	force_unbind(vma);
> +	force_unbind(vma, false);
> +	list_del_init(&vma->vm_link);
> +	vm_ddestroy = vma->vm_ddestroy;
> +	vma->vm_ddestroy = false;
> +
> +	/* vma->vm may be freed when releasing vma->vm->mutex. */
> +	gt = vma->vm->gt;
> +	mutex_unlock(&vma->vm->mutex);
> +	release_references(vma, gt, vm_ddestroy);
> +}
> +
> +void i915_vma_destroy_async(struct i915_vma *vma)
> +{
> +	bool vm_ddestroy, async = vma->obj->mm.rsgt;
> +	struct intel_gt *gt;
> +
> +	if (dma_resv_reserve_fences(vma->obj->base.resv, 1))
> +		async = false;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&vma->vm->mutex);
> +	/*
> +	 * Ensure any asynchronous binding is complete while using
> +	 * async unbind as we will be releasing the vma here.
> +	 */
> +	if (async && i915_active_wait(&vma->active))
> +		async = false;
> +
> +	force_unbind(vma, async);
>   	list_del_init(&vma->vm_link);
>   	vm_ddestroy = vma->vm_ddestroy;
>   	vma->vm_ddestroy = false;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h
> index 737ef310d046..25f15965dab8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h
> @@ -272,6 +272,7 @@ void i915_vma_reopen(struct i915_vma *vma);
>   
>   void i915_vma_destroy_locked(struct i915_vma *vma);
>   void i915_vma_destroy(struct i915_vma *vma);
> +void i915_vma_destroy_async(struct i915_vma *vma);
>   
>   #define assert_vma_held(vma) dma_resv_assert_held((vma)->obj->base.resv)
>   
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> index e5600f358a15..431d40bb1dee 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> @@ -3969,7 +3969,8 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_vm_bind {
>    * any error.
>    *
>    * VM_BIND/UNBIND ioctl calls executed on different CPU threads concurrently
> - * are not ordered.
> + * are not ordered. Furthermore, parts of the VM_UNBIND operation can be done
> + * asynchronously.
>    */
>   struct drm_i915_gem_vm_unbind {
>   	/** @vm_id: VM (address space) id to bind */