From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Fixing error code for WOPCM initialization
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 14:05:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9f05a39-eb94-d571-50e0-717fef5b60c1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190305005556.25073-1-sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
On 3/4/19 4:55 PM, Sujaritha Sundaresan wrote:
> Replacing the -E2BIG error code return for WOPCM
> initialization with -ENODEV. This will prevent the pci from
> picking this up as a warning during fault injection testing.
To clarify, we want to silence this:
>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> index f82a415ea2ba..a651557e6e4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
> GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->size);
>
> if (i915_inject_load_failure())
> - return -E2BIG;
> + return -ENODEV;
Would it be better to just change the final return code in
i915_pci_probe() to ENODEV?
i.e.
err = i915_driver_load(pdev, ent);
if (err)
return i915_error_injected() ? -ENODEV : err;
This way we can test that the possible error codes (E2BIG in this case)
don't hit issues in dedicated cases during onion unwinding.
Daniele
>
> if (guc_fw_size >= wopcm->size) {
> DRM_ERROR("GuC FW (%uKiB) is too big to fit in WOPCM.",
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-05 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-05 0:55 [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Fixing error code for WOPCM initialization Sujaritha Sundaresan
2019-03-05 2:23 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/1] " Patchwork
2019-03-05 7:25 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-03-05 22:05 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2019-03-05 22:06 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-03-06 0:11 ` Sujaritha
2019-03-06 0:30 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: " Sujaritha Sundaresan
2019-03-06 8:41 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2019-03-06 8:45 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-06 9:01 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2019-03-06 9:08 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-06 18:44 ` Sujaritha
2019-03-06 19:17 ` Sundaresan, Sujaritha
2019-03-06 1:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2] drm/i915/guc: Fixing error code for WOPCM initialization (rev2) Patchwork
2019-03-06 9:10 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a9f05a39-eb94-d571-50e0-717fef5b60c1@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox