From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/dp: Check if guardband can accommodate sdp latencies
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 15:02:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPIwcasPJ9PCU4yq@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251017050202.2211985-4-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 10:32:00AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Check if guardband is sufficient for all DP SDP latencies.
> If its not, fail .compute_config_late().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 3f2c319e3d6f..8ae99cee79d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
> #include "intel_psr.h"
> #include "intel_quirks.h"
> #include "intel_tc.h"
> +#include "intel_vblank.h"
> #include "intel_vdsc.h"
> #include "intel_vrr.h"
>
> @@ -6980,14 +6981,35 @@ void intel_dp_mst_resume(struct intel_display *display)
> }
> }
>
> +static
> +int intel_dp_sdp_compute_config_late(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> + int guardband = intel_crtc_vblank_length(crtc_state);
In theory we might have enough legacy TG vblank but not VRR guardband
(I suppose that can only happen on ICL/TGL due to the pipeline full
limit) so I was pondering whether we might need to check both. But I
think this is fine. We would just fail when trying to enable VRR in
those cases, but without VRR enabled we can still light up th display.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> + int min_sdp_guardband = intel_dp_sdp_min_guardband(crtc_state, false);
> +
> + if (guardband < min_sdp_guardband) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "guardband %d < min sdp guardband %d\n",
> + guardband, min_sdp_guardband);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int intel_dp_compute_config_late(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
> {
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> + int ret;
>
> intel_psr_compute_config_late(intel_dp, crtc_state);
>
> + ret = intel_dp_sdp_compute_config_late(crtc_state);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.45.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-17 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-17 5:01 [PATCH 0/5] Optimize vrr.guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17 5:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add helper to get min psr guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17 9:07 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17 9:30 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17 9:41 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-10-17 9:37 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-10-17 9:58 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17 10:15 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17 10:30 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17 11:11 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-10-17 11:30 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17 5:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/dp: Add helper to get min sdp guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17 10:50 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-10-17 11:07 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-10-17 5:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/dp: Check if guardband can accommodate sdp latencies Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17 12:02 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-10-17 5:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/vrr: Use the min static optimized guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17 12:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-17 5:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/vrr: Use optimized guardband whenever VRR TG is active Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17 12:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-17 6:10 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Optimize vrr.guardband (rev3) Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-17 12:34 [PATCH 0/5] Optimize vrr.guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-17 12:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/dp: Check if guardband can accommodate sdp latencies Ankit Nautiyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPIwcasPJ9PCU4yq@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox