From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] drm/xe/rps: build RPS as part of xe
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 16:20:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRc6ljcNlHr0vRsK@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4f2a646f5fd41c68b6c536c222786f5ab7020ac.1763115899.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 12:26:49PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Reduce the conditional compilation in i915 by building
> intel_display_rps.c as part of the xe module. This doesn't actually
> enable RPS on xe, because there's no parent interface implementation on
> xe side, but it's a step in the right direction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h | 21 -------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h
> index 183d154f2c7c..96b1fd00ead4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ struct drm_crtc;
> struct intel_atomic_state;
> struct intel_display;
>
> -#ifdef I915
> void intel_display_rps_boost_after_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> struct dma_fence *fence);
> void intel_display_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_display *display,
> @@ -22,25 +21,5 @@ void intel_display_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_display *display,
> void ilk_display_rps_enable(struct intel_display *display);
> void ilk_display_rps_disable(struct intel_display *display);
> void ilk_display_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_display *display);
> -#else
> -static inline void intel_display_rps_boost_after_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> - struct dma_fence *fence)
> -{
> -}
> -static inline void intel_display_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - bool interactive)
> -{
> -}
> -static inline void ilk_display_rps_enable(struct intel_display *display)
> -{
> -}
> -static inline void ilk_display_rps_disable(struct intel_display *display)
> -{
> -}
> -static inline void ilk_display_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_display *display)
> -{
> -}
> -#endif
>
> #endif /* __INTEL_DISPLAY_RPS_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> index c2d2303a8198..1a3aa041820d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> @@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ xe-$(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY) += \
> i915-display/intel_display_power_map.o \
> i915-display/intel_display_power_well.o \
> i915-display/intel_display_rpm.o \
> + i915-display/intel_display_rps.o \
> i915-display/intel_display_trace.o \
> i915-display/intel_display_utils.o \
> i915-display/intel_display_wa.o \
> --
> 2.47.3
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-14 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-14 10:26 [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: call irq and rps through the parent interface Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/{i915, xe}/display: duplicate gen2 irq/error init/reset in display irq Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915/display: convert the display irq interfaces to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/{i915, xe}/display: move irq calls to parent interface Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 13:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/{i915,xe}/display: " Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: add .vgpu_active " Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 13:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: add .fence_support_legacy " Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 14:03 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-14 15:16 ` [PATCH v2] FIXME drm/i915: add .has_fenced_regions " Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 15:18 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 16:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/rps: store struct dma_fence in struct wait_rps_boost Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 14:03 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/rps: call RPS functions via the parent interface Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 14:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-14 15:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 16:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/rps: postpone i915 fence check to boost Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 14:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-14 14:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: add .fence_priority_display to parent interface Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 14:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-14 15:32 ` [PATCH v3] " Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 10:26 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/xe/rps: build RPS as part of xe Jani Nikula
2025-11-14 14:20 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-11-14 12:03 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: call irq and rps through the parent interface Patchwork
2025-11-15 5:22 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for drm/i915: call irq and rps through the parent interface (rev4) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRc6ljcNlHr0vRsK@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox