From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 21:50:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXu6F--1uHmgedwR@ideak-desk.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260129171154.3898077-9-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 10:41:46PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Refactor the logic to get the number of joined pipes. Start with a single
> pipe and incrementally try additional pipes only if needed. While DSC
> overhead is not yet computed here, this restructuring prepares the code to
> support that in follow-up changes.
>
> v2:
> - Remove fallback in case force-joiner configuration fails. (Imre)
> - Drop redundant MODE_OK assignment (Imre)
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 91 ++++++++++++---------
> 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index a355900a31d9..febfea641e56 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1371,7 +1371,6 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid_downstream(struct intel_connector *connector,
> return MODE_OK;
> }
>
> -static
> int intel_dp_max_hdisplay_per_pipe(struct intel_display *display)
> {
> return DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 30 ? 6144 : 5120;
> @@ -1434,7 +1433,6 @@ bool intel_dp_has_dsc(const struct intel_connector *connector)
> return true;
> }
>
> -static
> bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
> int num_joined_pipes)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> index 25bfbfd291b0..6d409c1998c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> @@ -225,5 +225,8 @@ int intel_dp_compute_config_late(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> struct drm_connector_state *conn_state);
> int intel_dp_sdp_min_guardband(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> bool assume_all_enabled);
> +int intel_dp_max_hdisplay_per_pipe(struct intel_display *display);
> +bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
> + int num_joined_pipes);
>
> #endif /* __INTEL_DP_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> index fc9367cc42ec..414c7ffc704e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -1420,7 +1420,6 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr = &intel_dp->mst.mgr;
> struct drm_dp_mst_port *port = connector->mst.port;
> const int min_bpp = 18;
> - int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
> int max_rate, mode_rate, max_lanes, max_link_clock;
> unsigned long bw_overhead_flags =
> DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_MST | DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_SSC_REF_CLK;
> @@ -1428,6 +1427,7 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> bool dsc = false;
> int target_clock = mode->clock;
> int num_joined_pipes;
> + int num_pipes;
>
> if (drm_connector_is_unregistered(&connector->base)) {
> *status = MODE_ERROR;
> @@ -1480,47 +1480,62 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> return 0;
> }
>
> - num_joined_pipes = intel_dp_num_joined_pipes(intel_dp, connector,
> - mode->hdisplay, target_clock);
> + for (num_pipes = 1; num_pipes <= I915_MAX_PIPES; num_pipes++) {
> + int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
>
> - if (intel_dp_has_dsc(connector) && drm_dp_sink_supports_fec(connector->dp.fec_capability)) {
> - /*
> - * TBD pass the connector BPC,
> - * for now U8_MAX so that max BPC on that platform would be picked
> - */
> - int pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(connector, U8_MAX);
> -
> - if (!drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(max_link_clock))
> - bw_overhead_flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_FEC;
> -
> - dsc = intel_dp_mode_valid_with_dsc(connector,
> - max_link_clock, max_lanes,
> - target_clock, mode->hdisplay,
> - num_joined_pipes,
> - INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB, pipe_bpp,
> - bw_overhead_flags);
> - }
> -
> - if (intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(display, num_joined_pipes) && !dsc) {
> *status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
This needs to be inited before the loop.
> - return 0;
> +
> + if (connector->force_joined_pipes &&
> + num_pipes != connector->force_joined_pipes)
> + continue;
> +
> + num_joined_pipes = num_pipes;
No need for two variables.
> +
> + if (!intel_dp_can_join(display, num_joined_pipes))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (mode->hdisplay > num_joined_pipes * intel_dp_max_hdisplay_per_pipe(display))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (intel_dp_has_dsc(connector) &&
> + drm_dp_sink_supports_fec(connector->dp.fec_capability)) {
> + /*
> + * TBD pass the connector BPC,
> + * for now U8_MAX so that max BPC on that platform would be picked
> + */
> + int pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(connector, U8_MAX);
> +
> + if (!drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(max_link_clock))
> + bw_overhead_flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_FEC;
> +
> + dsc = intel_dp_mode_valid_with_dsc(connector,
> + max_link_clock, max_lanes,
> + target_clock, mode->hdisplay,
> + num_joined_pipes,
> + INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB, pipe_bpp,
> + bw_overhead_flags);
> + }
> +
> + if (intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(display, num_joined_pipes) && !dsc)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (mode_rate > max_rate && !dsc)
> + continue;
> +
> + *status = intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size(display, mode, num_joined_pipes);
> +
> + if (*status != MODE_OK)
> + continue;
> +
> + max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> +
> + if (mode->clock > max_dotclk)
> + *status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> +
> + if (status == MODE_OK)
> + break;
Nit: would be better to match what intel_dp_mode_valid() is doing:
if (mode->clock > max_dotclk) {
*status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
continue;
}
break;
With the things above addressed:
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> }
>
> - if (mode_rate > max_rate && !dsc) {
> - *status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - *status = intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size(display, mode, num_joined_pipes);
> -
> - if (*status != MODE_OK)
> - return 0;
> -
> - max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> -
> - if (mode->clock > max_dotclk)
> - *status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-29 17:11 [PATCH 00/16] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/dp: Early reject bad hdisplay in intel_dp_mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/dp: Move num_joined_pipes and related checks together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/dp: Extract helper to get the hdisplay limit Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 19:31 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 19:35 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the check for dotclock at the end Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the joiner dependent code together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 19:50 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Extract helper to compute link for given joiner config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 20:01 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/dp: Remove unused joiner helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 20:05 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid() Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 20:20 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/display: Add upper limit check for pixel clock Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/display: Extend the max dotclock limit to WCL Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 20:21 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 18:26 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices (rev5) Patchwork
2026-01-30 4:17 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-28 14:06 [PATCH 00/16] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 21:21 ` Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXu6F--1uHmgedwR@ideak-desk.lan \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox