From: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks for SLPC
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 17:16:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa5a420b-92c0-dcfb-12e0-9ef33b2dda55@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211020195216.36173-4-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Please fix code style related warnings and errors from checkpatch result.
On 21-10-2021 01:22, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> Add a helper to sort through the SLPC/RPS cases of get/set methods.
> Boost frequency will be modified as long as it is within the constraints
> of RP0 and if it is different from the existing one. We will set min
> freq to boost only if there is an active waiter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 18 +++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c | 21 ++--------
> 5 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> index 023e9c0b9f4a..19c57aac9553 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> @@ -935,6 +935,50 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps)
> GT_TRACE(rps_to_gt(rps), "park:%x\n", rps->cur_freq);
> }
>
> +u32 intel_rps_get_boost_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
> +{
> + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
> +
> + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
> + return slpc->boost_freq;
> + else
> + return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->boost_freq);
> +}
> +
> +static int set_boost_freq(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val)
> +{
> + bool boost = false;
> +
> + /* Validate against (static) hardware limits */
> + val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val);
> + if (val < rps->min_freq || val > rps->max_freq)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
> + if (val != rps->boost_freq) {
> + rps->boost_freq = val;
> + boost = atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
> + if (boost)
> + schedule_work(&rps->work);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int intel_rps_set_boost_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 freq)
> +{
> + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
> +
> + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
> + slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
> +
> + return intel_guc_slpc_set_boost_freq(slpc, freq);
> + } else {
> + return set_boost_freq(rps, freq);
> + }
> +}
> +
> void intel_rps_update_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps)
> {
> struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
> index 4ca9924cb5ed..ce81094cf58e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps);
> void intel_rps_unpark(struct intel_rps *rps);
> void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq);
> void intel_rps_update_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps);
> +u32 intel_rps_get_boost_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
> +int intel_rps_set_boost_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 freq);
>
> int intel_rps_set(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 val);
> void intel_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_rps *rps, bool interactive);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> index a104371a8b79..7881bc1a5af8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
> @@ -613,6 +613,24 @@ void intel_guc_slpc_boost(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> slpc->num_waiters++;
> }
>
> +int intel_guc_slpc_set_boost_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val)
> +{
> + if (val < slpc->min_freq || val > slpc->rp0_freq)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (val != slpc->boost_freq) {
> + slpc->boost_freq = val;
> +
> + /* Apply only if there are active waiters */
> + if (slpc->num_waiters)
> + return slpc_set_param(slpc,
> + SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
> + slpc->boost_freq);
As per comments from some other ML wakeref may be needed here.
CC: jon.ewins@intel.com, ashutosh.dixit@intel.com
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> void intel_guc_slpc_update_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> {
> /* Return min back to the softlimit.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
> index 25093dfdea0b..d8191f2b965b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
> void intel_guc_slpc_fini(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
> int intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val);
> int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val);
> +int intel_guc_slpc_set_boost_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val);
> int intel_guc_slpc_get_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
> int intel_guc_slpc_get_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
> int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
> index cdf0e9c6fd73..c62eb0c8eb45 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribu
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev);
> struct intel_rps *rps = &i915->gt.rps;
>
> - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->boost_freq));
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_rps_get_boost_frequency(rps));
> }
>
> static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
> @@ -289,7 +289,6 @@ static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev);
> struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt.rps;
> - bool boost = false;
> ssize_t ret;
> u32 val;
>
> @@ -297,21 +296,9 @@ static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - /* Validate against (static) hardware limits */
> - val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val);
> - if (val < rps->min_freq || val > rps->max_freq)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
> - if (val != rps->boost_freq) {
> - rps->boost_freq = val;
> - boost = atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters);
> - }
> - mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
> - if (boost)
> - schedule_work(&rps->work);
> -
> - return count;
> + ret = intel_rps_set_boost_frequency(rps, val);
> +
> + return ret ?: count;
> }
>
> static ssize_t vlv_rpe_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-21 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-20 19:52 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-10-20 19:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Define and initialize boost frequency Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-10-20 19:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-10-20 19:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-10-21 11:46 ` Nilawar, Badal [this message]
2021-10-20 22:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost " Patchwork
2021-10-20 22:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-01 4:39 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/3] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-01 4:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-01 20:28 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-11-04 0:39 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-11-02 1:26 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-02 1:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-04 0:41 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa5a420b-92c0-dcfb-12e0-9ef33b2dda55@intel.com \
--to=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox