Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT PULL] drm-misc + drm-intel: Add support for out-of-band hotplug notification

["Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>]

On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 10:23 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 04:03:43PM +0000, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 18:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On 8/24/21 10:45 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 20 Aug 2021, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hello drm-misc and drm-intel maintainers,
> > > > > 
> > > > > My "Add support for out-of-band hotplug notification"
> > > > > patchset:
> > > > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93763/
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is ready for merging now, as discussed on IRC I based this
> > > > > series
> > > > > on top drm-tip and when trying to apply the i915 parts on top
> > > > > of drm-misc this fails due to conflict.
> > > > > 
> > > > > So as Jani suggested here is a pull-req for a topic-branch
> > > > > with
> > > > > the
> > > > > entire set, minus the troublesome i915 bits. Once this has
> > > > > been
> > > > > merged
> > > > > into both drm-misc-next and drm-intel-next I can push the 2
> > > > > i915
> > > > > patch do drm-intel-next on top of the merge.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Note there are also 2 drivers/usb/typec patches in here these
> > > > > have Greg KH's Reviewed-by for merging through the drm tree,
> > > > > Since this USB code does not change all that much. I also
> > > > > checked
> > > > > and the drm-misc-next-2021-08-12 base of this tree contains
> > > > > the
> > > > > same last commit to the modified file as usb-next.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Daniel Vetter mentioned on IRC that it might be better for
> > > > > you to
> > > > > simply
> > > > > pick-up the series directly from patchwork, that is fine too
> > > > > in
> > > > > that
> > > > > case don't forget to add:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > To the entire series (given in a reply to the cover-letter)
> > > > > 
> > > > > And:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > > > 
> > > > > To the usb/typec patches (patch 7/8), this was given in reply
> > > > > to a previous posting of the series and I forgot to add this
> > > > > in the resend.
> > > > 
> > > > Since this is mostly touching drm core, I think it should be
> > > > merged
> > > > to
> > > > drm-misc-next first, and drm-intel-next after. Please let us
> > > > know.
> > > 
> > > I agree this should go to drm-misc-next first.
> > > 
> > > (I was planning on pushing this to drm-misc-next myself,
> > > but then ended up going with the topic branch because of the
> > > conflict in the i915 bits.)
> > 
> > Just to be clear and avoid confusion: This pull request does apply
> > cleanly on drm-misc-next nd drm-intel-next right now.
> > 
> > I'm just waiting for drm-misc-next maintainers to pull this to drm-
> > misc-next so I can pull it to drm-intel-next.
> > 
> > Maxime, is that your round now?
> > or Thomas?
> 
> That's me, I just pushed it to drm-misc-next

Thank you!
I also pushed to drm-intel-next.

> 
> Thanks!
> Maxime