From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND 1/6] drm/{i915, xe}: move xe_display_flush_cleanup_work() to i915 display
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 17:56:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agSRBmiw7mVNxKC2@ideak-desk.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6cb2e030e9118084abfc315c557a8b11d8db3d7@intel.com>
On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 05:19:19PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2026, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 10:58:35AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> xe_display_flush_cleanup_work() is a bit of an oddball function in xe
> >> display code. There shouldn't be anything this specific or xe
> >> specific. While I'm not sure what the correct refactor for the function
> >> should be, move it to shared display code for starters, next to the
> >> eerily similar but slightly different intel_has_pending_fb_unpin() that
> >> is only called from i915 core.
> >>
> >> The main goal here is to unblock some refactors on
> >> for_each_intel_crtc().
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 21 +++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 1 +
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 27 +++-----------------
> >> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >> index d5cf1476c7b9..50feca52b962 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >> @@ -737,6 +737,27 @@ bool intel_has_pending_fb_unpin(struct intel_display *display)
> >> return false;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +void intel_display_flush_cleanup_work(struct intel_display *display)
> >> +{
> >> + struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> >> +
> >> + for_each_intel_crtc(display->drm, crtc) {
> >> + struct drm_crtc_commit *commit;
> >> +
> >> + spin_lock(&crtc->base.commit_lock);
> >> + commit = list_first_entry_or_null(&crtc->base.commit_list,
> >> + struct drm_crtc_commit, commit_entry);
> >> + if (commit)
> >> + drm_crtc_commit_get(commit);
> >> + spin_unlock(&crtc->base.commit_lock);
> >> +
> >> + if (commit) {
> >> + wait_for_completion(&commit->cleanup_done);
> >> + drm_crtc_commit_put(commit);
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * Finds the encoder associated with the given CRTC. This can only be
> >> * used when we know that the CRTC isn't feeding multiple encoders!
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> >> index a43ada0c0502..65f8c81a7bae 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> >> @@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ void intel_disable_transcoder(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state);
> >> void i830_enable_pipe(struct intel_display *display, enum pipe pipe);
> >> void i830_disable_pipe(struct intel_display *display, enum pipe pipe);
> >> bool intel_has_pending_fb_unpin(struct intel_display *display);
> >> +void intel_display_flush_cleanup_work(struct intel_display *display);
> >> void intel_encoder_destroy(struct drm_encoder *encoder);
> >> struct drm_display_mode *
> >> intel_encoder_current_mode(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> >> index aa73023b7398..ef27fdfdbab2 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> >> @@ -258,27 +258,6 @@ static bool suspend_to_idle(void)
> >> return false;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static void xe_display_flush_cleanup_work(struct xe_device *xe)
> >> -{
> >> - struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> >> -
> >> - for_each_intel_crtc(&xe->drm, crtc) {
> >> - struct drm_crtc_commit *commit;
> >> -
> >> - spin_lock(&crtc->base.commit_lock);
> >> - commit = list_first_entry_or_null(&crtc->base.commit_list,
> >> - struct drm_crtc_commit, commit_entry);
> >> - if (commit)
> >> - drm_crtc_commit_get(commit);
> >> - spin_unlock(&crtc->base.commit_lock);
> >> -
> >> - if (commit) {
> >> - wait_for_completion(&commit->cleanup_done);
> >> - drm_crtc_commit_put(commit);
> >> - }
> >> - }
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> static void xe_display_enable_d3cold(struct xe_device *xe)
> >> {
> >> struct intel_display *display = xe->display;
> >> @@ -292,7 +271,7 @@ static void xe_display_enable_d3cold(struct xe_device *xe)
> >> */
> >> intel_power_domains_disable(display);
> >>
> >> - xe_display_flush_cleanup_work(xe);
> >> + intel_display_flush_cleanup_work(display);
> >>
> >> intel_opregion_suspend(display, PCI_D3cold);
> >>
> >> @@ -347,7 +326,7 @@ void xe_display_pm_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
> >> intel_display_driver_suspend(display);
> >> }
> >>
> >> - xe_display_flush_cleanup_work(xe);
> >> + intel_display_flush_cleanup_work(display);
> >
> > intel_display_driver_suspend() already flushes the cleanup wq. So I
> > think this is doing nothing. The correct answer seems to be to nuke
> > the whole thing. We are missing the wq flush from the shutdown() path
> > in i915 however, so I suppose we should add it there.
> >
> >>
> >> intel_encoder_block_all_hpds(display);
> >>
> >> @@ -379,7 +358,7 @@ void xe_display_pm_shutdown(struct xe_device *xe)
> >> intel_display_driver_suspend(display);
> >
> > This should rather be the same atomic helper shutdown that i915 uses.
> > I guess what we want is a intel_display_driver_shutdown() to pair
> > up with intel_display_driver_suspend().
>
> Yeah, well, another "Hal fixes a light bulb" moment. I just wanted to
> clean up the iterators, but I can't do that with xe having crtc
> iteration, which it never should have had in the first place.
>
> I think all of the i915/xe/display probe/cleanup/suspend/resume paths
> are a gigantic mess. It was a mess with just i915, and xe added another,
> *different* mess. They both do things differently, but *neither* should
> be calling low-level display stuff directly.
>
> I'll try to cook something up for this.
Fwiw, this came up already earlier [1] and then I came up with
https://github.com/ideak/linux/commits/suspend-shutdown-refactor
but haven't followed up with it. For reference I rebased it now on
drm-tip.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aIjizdet9ZUXB-yx@ideak-desk
>
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> >
> >> }
> >>
> >> - xe_display_flush_cleanup_work(xe);
> >> + intel_display_flush_cleanup_work(display);
> >> intel_dp_mst_suspend(display);
> >> intel_encoder_block_all_hpds(display);
> >> intel_hpd_cancel_work(display);
> >> --
> >> 2.47.3
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 7:58 [RESEND 0/6] drm/i915: crtc iteration cleanups Jani Nikula
2026-05-13 7:58 ` [RESEND 1/6] drm/{i915, xe}: move xe_display_flush_cleanup_work() to i915 display Jani Nikula
2026-05-13 12:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-05-13 14:19 ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-13 14:56 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2026-05-13 7:58 ` [RESEND 2/6] drm/i915/display: switch from drm_for_each_crtc() to for_each_intel_crtc() Jani Nikula
2026-05-13 7:58 ` [RESEND 3/6] drm/i915/display: always pass display->drm to for_each_intel_crtc*() Jani Nikula
2026-05-13 12:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-05-13 7:58 ` [RESEND 4/6] drm/i915/display: pass struct intel_display to all for_each_intel_crtc*() macros Jani Nikula
2026-05-13 12:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-05-13 7:58 ` [RESEND 5/6] drm/i915/display: stop passing i to for_each_*_intel_crtc_in_state() macros Jani Nikula
2026-05-13 12:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-05-13 7:58 ` [RESEND 6/6] drm/i915/display: stop passing i to for_each_pipe_crtc_modeset_{enable, disable}() Jani Nikula
2026-05-13 12:23 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-05-13 8:59 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: crtc iteration cleanups (rev2) Patchwork
2026-05-13 8:59 ` Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agSRBmiw7mVNxKC2@ideak-desk.lan \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox