Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Martin Hodo" <martin.hodo@intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, "Animesh Manna" <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/bios: range check LFP Data Block panel_type2
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:37:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aj6AkhNsUpWDEify@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625135130.1067872-1-jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 04:51:30PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> While the panel_type from LFP Data Block is range checked, panel_type2
> is not. Add a few helpers for range checking, and use them to not only
> check panel_type2, but also imrove clarity and correctness in the panel
> type selection.
> 
> Discovered using AI-assisted static analysis confirmed by Intel Product
> Security.
> 
> Reported-by: Martin Hodo <martin.hodo@intel.com>
> Fixes: 6434cf630086 ("drm/i915/bios: calculate panel type as per child device index in VBT")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.0+
> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index 15ebadc72b88..0c420019e46a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -623,6 +623,16 @@ get_lfp_data_tail(const struct bdb_lfp_data *data,
>  		return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static bool is_panel_type_valid(int panel_type)
> +{
> +	return panel_type >= 0 && panel_type < 16;
> +}
> +
> +static bool is_panel_type_valid_or_pnp(int panel_type)
> +{
> +	return is_panel_type_valid(panel_type) || panel_type == 0xff;
> +}
> +
>  static int opregion_get_panel_type(struct intel_display *display,
>  				   const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata,
>  				   const struct drm_edid *drm_edid, bool use_fallback)
> @@ -640,15 +650,21 @@ static int vbt_get_panel_type(struct intel_display *display,
>  	if (!lfp_options)
>  		return -1;
>  
> -	if (lfp_options->panel_type > 0xf &&
> -	    lfp_options->panel_type != 0xff) {
> +	if (!is_panel_type_valid_or_pnp(lfp_options->panel_type)) {
>  		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Invalid VBT panel type 0x%x\n",
>  			    lfp_options->panel_type);
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (devdata && devdata->child.handle == DEVICE_HANDLE_LFP2)
> +	if (devdata && devdata->child.handle == DEVICE_HANDLE_LFP2) {
> +		if (!is_panel_type_valid_or_pnp(lfp_options->panel_type2)) {
> +			drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Invalid VBT panel type 2 0x%x\n",
> +				    lfp_options->panel_type2);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +
>  		return lfp_options->panel_type2;
> +	}
>  
>  	drm_WARN_ON(display->drm,
>  		    devdata && devdata->child.handle != DEVICE_HANDLE_LFP1);
> @@ -762,13 +778,12 @@ static int get_panel_type(struct intel_display *display,
>  				    panel_types[i].name, panel_types[i].panel_type);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (panel_types[PANEL_TYPE_OPREGION].panel_type >= 0)
> +	if (is_panel_type_valid(panel_types[PANEL_TYPE_OPREGION].panel_type))
>  		i = PANEL_TYPE_OPREGION;
>  	else if (panel_types[PANEL_TYPE_VBT].panel_type == 0xff &&

is_panel_type_pnp()?

> -		 panel_types[PANEL_TYPE_PNPID].panel_type >= 0)
> +		 is_panel_type_valid(panel_types[PANEL_TYPE_PNPID].panel_type))
>  		i = PANEL_TYPE_PNPID;
> -	else if (panel_types[PANEL_TYPE_VBT].panel_type != 0xff &&
> -		 panel_types[PANEL_TYPE_VBT].panel_type >= 0)
> +	else if (is_panel_type_valid(panel_types[PANEL_TYPE_VBT].panel_type))
>  		i = PANEL_TYPE_VBT;
>  	else
>  		i = PANEL_TYPE_FALLBACK;
> -- 
> 2.47.3

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-26 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-25 13:51 [PATCH] drm/i915/bios: range check LFP Data Block panel_type2 Jani Nikula
2026-06-25 15:27 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-06-25 18:58 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2026-06-26  1:38 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2026-06-26 13:37 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2026-06-26 14:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aj6AkhNsUpWDEify@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.hodo@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox