From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/de: Convert intel_de_{read,write}() into vfuncs
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 17:35:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <au3zxf-6iAvo-fZj@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f51fb847cb0bbe5d17eaba71d16fb03059444626@intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 04:50:19PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Nov 2026, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Different platforms will need to do different things in
> > their mmio accessors. The plan is to trade the overhead
> > of runtime platform checks into no runtime checks and
> > the cost of a vfunc call. This seems to provide slightly
> > better overall performance.
>
> What's the plan for the 8- and 16-bit counterparts?
Just raw readb/readw.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h | 9 +++++++--
> > .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h | 2 ++
> > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.c
> > index 6b3d06147e58..4f423a684ec2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.c
> > @@ -163,7 +163,24 @@ u16 intel_de_read16(struct intel_display *display, intel_reg_t reg)
> > return intel_uncore_read16(__to_uncore(display), reg);
> > }
> >
> > +static u32 i9xx_mmio_read(struct intel_display *display, intel_reg_t reg)
> > +{
> > + return intel_uncore_read(__to_uncore(display), reg);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void i9xx_mmio_write(struct intel_display *display, intel_reg_t reg, u32 val)
> > +{
> > + intel_uncore_write(__to_uncore(display), reg, val);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct intel_mmio_funcs i9xx_mmio_funcs = {
> > + .read = i9xx_mmio_read,
> > + .write = i9xx_mmio_write,
> > +};
> > +
> > void intel_de_init(struct intel_display *display)
> > {
> > display->mmio.uncore = to_intel_uncore(display->drm);
> > +
> > + display->mmio.funcs = &i9xx_mmio_funcs;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
> > index f1135ee5071b..63aef17e6ed3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,11 @@
> > #include "intel_uncore.h"
> > #include "intel_uncore_trace.h"
> >
> > +struct intel_mmio_funcs {
> > + u32 (*read)(struct intel_display *display, intel_reg_t reg);
> > + void (*write)(struct intel_display *display, intel_reg_t reg, u32 val);
> > +};
> > +
>
> Wondering if this should be in intel_display_core.h as all the other
> ones are. But let's see how it pans out.
Only intel_de.{c,h} need the definition so seems like it belongs there.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> > static inline struct intel_uncore *__to_uncore(struct intel_display *display)
> > {
> > return display->mmio.uncore;
> > @@ -30,7 +35,7 @@ intel_de_read(struct intel_display *display, intel_reg_t reg)
> >
> > intel_dmc_wl_get(display, reg);
> >
> > - val = intel_uncore_read(__to_uncore(display), reg);
> > + val = display->mmio.funcs->read(display, reg);
> >
> > intel_dmc_wl_put(display, reg);
> >
> > @@ -60,7 +65,7 @@ intel_de_write(struct intel_display *display, intel_reg_t reg, u32 val)
> > {
> > intel_dmc_wl_get(display, reg);
> >
> > - intel_uncore_write(__to_uncore(display), reg, val);
> > + display->mmio.funcs->write(display, reg, val);
> >
> > intel_dmc_wl_put(display, reg);
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> > index 35409f9abb2f..3a48119f7890 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h
> > @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct intel_fbdev;
> > struct intel_fdi_funcs;
> > struct intel_hotplug_irq_funcs;
> > struct intel_initial_plane_config;
> > +struct intel_mmio_funcs;
> > struct intel_opregion;
> > struct intel_overlay;
> > struct intel_uncore;
> > @@ -533,6 +534,7 @@ struct intel_display {
> >
> > struct {
> > struct intel_uncore *uncore;
> > + const struct intel_mmio_funcs *funcs;
> > } mmio;
> >
> > struct {
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 22:18 [PATCH 0/9] drm/i915/de: Work towards uncore elimination Ville Syrjala
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/de: Introduce dislay->mmio and intel_de_init() Ville Syrjala
2026-11-04 22:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 8:58 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-05 20:03 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-11-04 23:29 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/de: Convert intel_de_{read,write}() into vfuncs Ville Syrjala
2026-11-06 14:50 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-06 15:35 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/de: Introduce mmio read/write templates Ville Syrjala
2026-11-04 23:32 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-11-06 14:52 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-06 16:03 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/de: Eliminate runtime overhead from DMC wakelock on pre-LNL platforms Ville Syrjala
2026-11-06 14:53 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/de: Introduce display->mmio.lock Ville Syrjala
2026-11-04 22:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 9:32 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-05 13:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-11-05 13:47 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-06 14:55 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/uncore: Don't meddle with mmio debug upon user forcewake Ville Syrjala
2026-11-06 14:58 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/de: Move unclaimed mmio detection into display code Ville Syrjala
2026-11-04 22:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 16:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-11-06 16:39 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-06 17:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/de: Stop using intel_uncore_{read,write}() Ville Syrjala
2026-11-06 15:37 ` Jani Nikula
2026-11-06 15:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-11-04 22:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe: Nuke the intel_uncore_{read,write}() wrappers Ville Syrjala
2026-11-06 15:38 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe: Nuke the intel_uncore_{read, write}() wrappers Jani Nikula
2026-11-05 2:14 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/de: Work towards uncore elimination Patchwork
2026-11-05 4:38 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=au3zxf-6iAvo-fZj@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox