From: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/xehpsdv: Define MOCS table for XeHP SDV
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:07:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b79540e3-bacd-1fff-0374-827d910b2a1f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210904003544.2422282-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Appears to match latest BSPEC
Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
-Clint
On 9/3/21 5:35 PM, Matt Roper wrote:
> From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>
> Like DG1, XeHP SDV doesn't have LLC/eDRAM control values due to being a
> dgfx card. XeHP SDV adds 2 more bits: L3_GLBGO to "push the Go point to
> memory for L3 destined transaction" and L3_LKP to "enable Lookup for
> uncacheable accesses".
>
> Bspec: 45101
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
> index e96afd7beb49..133cfe07cb9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ struct drm_i915_mocs_table {
> #define L3_ESC(value) ((value) << 0)
> #define L3_SCC(value) ((value) << 1)
> #define _L3_CACHEABILITY(value) ((value) << 4)
> +#define L3_GLBGO(value) ((value) << 6)
> +#define L3_LKUP(value) ((value) << 7)
>
> /* Helper defines */
> #define GEN9_NUM_MOCS_ENTRIES 64 /* 63-64 are reserved, but configured. */
> @@ -315,6 +317,31 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry dg1_mocs_table[] = {
> MOCS_ENTRY(63, 0, L3_1_UC),
> };
>
> +static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry xehpsdv_mocs_table[] = {
> + /* wa_1608975824 */
> + MOCS_ENTRY(0, 0, L3_3_WB | L3_LKUP(1)),
> +
> + /* UC - Coherent; GO:L3 */
> + MOCS_ENTRY(1, 0, L3_1_UC | L3_LKUP(1)),
> + /* UC - Coherent; GO:Memory */
> + MOCS_ENTRY(2, 0, L3_1_UC | L3_GLBGO(1) | L3_LKUP(1)),
> + /* UC - Non-Coherent; GO:Memory */
> + MOCS_ENTRY(3, 0, L3_1_UC | L3_GLBGO(1)),
> + /* UC - Non-Coherent; GO:L3 */
> + MOCS_ENTRY(4, 0, L3_1_UC),
> +
> + /* WB */
> + MOCS_ENTRY(5, 0, L3_3_WB | L3_LKUP(1)),
> +
> + /* HW Reserved - SW program but never use. */
> + MOCS_ENTRY(48, 0, L3_3_WB | L3_LKUP(1)),
> + MOCS_ENTRY(49, 0, L3_1_UC | L3_LKUP(1)),
> + MOCS_ENTRY(60, 0, L3_1_UC),
> + MOCS_ENTRY(61, 0, L3_1_UC),
> + MOCS_ENTRY(62, 0, L3_1_UC),
> + MOCS_ENTRY(63, 0, L3_1_UC),
> +};
> +
> enum {
> HAS_GLOBAL_MOCS = BIT(0),
> HAS_ENGINE_MOCS = BIT(1),
> @@ -344,7 +371,13 @@ static unsigned int get_mocs_settings(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> memset(table, 0, sizeof(struct drm_i915_mocs_table));
>
> table->unused_entries_index = I915_MOCS_PTE;
> - if (IS_DG1(i915)) {
> + if (IS_XEHPSDV(i915)) {
> + table->size = ARRAY_SIZE(xehpsdv_mocs_table);
> + table->table = xehpsdv_mocs_table;
> + table->uc_index = 2;
> + table->n_entries = GEN9_NUM_MOCS_ENTRIES;
> + table->unused_entries_index = 5;
> + } else if (IS_DG1(i915)) {
> table->size = ARRAY_SIZE(dg1_mocs_table);
> table->table = dg1_mocs_table;
> table->uc_index = 1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-14 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-04 0:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Add MOCS tables for XeHP SDV and DG2 Matt Roper
2021-09-04 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/xehpsdv: Define MOCS table for XeHP SDV Matt Roper
2021-09-14 18:07 ` Clint Taylor [this message]
2021-09-04 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dg2: Define MOCS table for DG2 Matt Roper
2021-09-04 1:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Add MOCS tables for XeHP SDV and DG2 Patchwork
2021-09-04 4:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Add MOCS tables for XeHP SDV and DG2 (rev2) Patchwork
2021-09-07 16:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Add MOCS tables for XeHP SDV and DG2 (rev3) Patchwork
2021-09-07 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-09-07 19:37 ` Matt Roper
2021-09-08 3:50 ` Kattamanchi, JaswanthX
2021-09-08 3:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-14 22:31 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b79540e3-bacd-1fff-0374-827d910b2a1f@intel.com \
--to=clinton.a.taylor@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox