public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>
To: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] drm: allow render capable master with DRM_AUTH ioctls
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 12:25:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7d59964-dd42-04d9-b2dd-738898d44e42@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190527121015.GC15067@arch-x1c3>

Am 27.05.19 um 14:10 schrieb Emil Velikov:
> On 2019/05/27, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 27.05.19 um 10:17 schrieb Emil Velikov:
>>> From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
>>>
>>> There are cases (in mesa and applications) where one would open the
>>> primary node without properly authenticating the client.
>>>
>>> Sometimes we don't check if the authentication succeeds, but there's
>>> also cases we simply forget to do it.
>>>
>>> The former was a case for Mesa where it did not not check the return
>>> value of drmGetMagic() [1]. That was fixed recently although, there's
>>> the question of older drivers or other apps that exbibit this behaviour.
>>>
>>> While omitting the call results in issues as seen in [2] and [3].
>>>
>>> In the libva case, libva itself doesn't authenticate the DRM client and
>>> the vaGetDisplayDRM documentation doesn't mention if the app should
>>> either.
>>>
>>> As of today, the official vainfo utility doesn't authenticate.
>>>
>>> To workaround issues like these, some users resort to running their apps
>>> under sudo. Which admittedly isn't always a good idea.
>>>
>>> Since any DRIVER_RENDER driver has sufficient isolation between clients,
>>> we can use that, for unauthenticated [primary node] ioctls that require
>>> DRM_AUTH. But only if the respective ioctl is tagged as DRM_RENDER_ALLOW.
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> - Rework/simplify if check (Daniel V)
>>> - Add examples to commit messages, elaborate. (Daniel V)
>>>
>>> v3:
>>> - Use single unlikely (Daniel V)
>>>
>>> v4:
>>> - Patch was reverted because it broke AMDGPU, apply again. The AMDGPU
>>> issue is fixed with earlier patch.
>> As far as I can see this only affects the following two IOCTLs after
>> removing DRM_AUTH from the DRM_RENDER_ALLOW IOCTLs:
>>> DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_HANDLE_TO_FD,
>>> drm_prime_handle_to_fd_ioctl, DRM_AUTH|DRM_UNLOCKED|DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
>>>          DRM_IOCTL_DEF(DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_FD_TO_HANDLE,
>>> drm_prime_fd_to_handle_ioctl, DRM_AUTH|DRM_UNLOCKED|DRM_RENDER_ALLOW)
>> So I think it would be simpler to just remove DRM_AUTH from those two
>> instead of allowing it for everybody.
>>
> If I understand you correctly this will remove DRM_AUTH also for drivers
> which expose only a primary node. I'm not sure if that is a good idea.

That's a good point, but I have doubts that those drivers implement the 
necessary callbacks and/or set the core feature flag for the IOCTLs.

So the maximum what could happen is that you change the returned error 
from -EACCES into -EOPNOTSUPP/-ENOSYS.

Regards,
Christian.

> That said, if others are OK with the idea I will prepare a patch.
>
> Thanks
> Emil

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-27 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20190527081741.14235-1-emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
2019-05-27  8:17 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: drop DRM_AUTH from DRM_RENDER_ALLOW ioctls Emil Velikov
2019-05-27  8:39   ` Jani Nikula
2019-05-27 11:57     ` Emil Velikov
2019-05-27  8:17 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm: allow render capable master with DRM_AUTH ioctls Emil Velikov
2019-05-27 11:56   ` Christian König
2019-05-27 12:10     ` Emil Velikov
2019-05-27 12:25       ` Koenig, Christian [this message]
2019-05-27 12:39   ` Thomas Hellstrom
2019-05-27 12:54     ` Emil Velikov
2019-05-27 13:16     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-05-27 14:01       ` Thomas Hellstrom
2019-05-27 15:22         ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7d59964-dd42-04d9-b2dd-738898d44e42@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox