Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Seblu <seblu@seblu.net>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: Fwd:  2.6.36-rc5 i915 regression
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:25:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9dded$gt4dll@orsmga002.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=p=4-MYQRrzWOJPGMa++78RryTcSjxSLjDUWuh@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:49:01 +0200, Seblu <seblu@seblu.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > Depending on where the tip was, at least one suspend regression was
> > recently fixed. It would be useful to recheck with 64193406.
> Yes i have this patch in, and the issue is still here.

Oh 6410. Yeah, that regression was pre-g4x. Do you have a good idea of the
precise range in which the regression was introduced, or is just another
eDP misery?
 
> Do you have seen this vmideo, which show the suspend to ram issue with
> ailine and drm-next and how it's functional with 2.6.35.7?
> 
> http://videobin.org/+2a5/2kp.ogg
> 
> >
> >> - after one day, applications become graphically slow.
> >
> > You're not alone. Eric has reported that writes to a GTT mapping become
> > glacially slow after some time, without any distortion in the CPU profile.
> > Can we collate what hardware we are seeing this effect on?
> lspci,lshw,cpuinfo, you did somthing more?

Just the chipset [Arrandale, in this case] for the time being, so I know
which machines to leave running to see if I can observe the effect here.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-26  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-01 11:00 2.6.36-rc5 i915 regression Johannes Hirte
2010-10-01 12:28 ` Chris Wilson
2010-10-01 12:55   ` Seblu
2010-10-01 13:22     ` Chris Wilson
2010-10-01 20:27       ` Seblu
2010-10-02  9:07         ` Zhenyu Wang
2010-10-07 23:24           ` Seblu
2010-10-09  9:40             ` Seblu
2010-10-10 13:52               ` Seblu
     [not found]                 ` <AANLkTinTX9hXMV+nn-qQjsGq-_fF8mwGc6p1P_-csJUR@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                   ` <89k77n$p72i7f@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com>
2010-10-18 16:38                     ` Fwd: " Seblu
2010-10-25 23:19                     ` Seblu
2010-10-25 23:47                       ` Peter Clifton
2010-10-26  0:57                         ` Seblu
2010-10-26  1:42                           ` Peter Clifton
2010-10-26  2:13                             ` Seblu
2010-10-26  8:30                       ` Chris Wilson
2010-10-26  8:49                         ` Seblu
2010-10-26  9:25                           ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2010-11-02 10:04                           ` Seblu
2010-10-30 20:13                         ` Chun-Yu Shei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='b9dded$gt4dll@orsmga002.jf.intel.com' \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=seblu@seblu.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox