From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Skip scanning for signalers if we are already inflight
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:19:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c203d3fa-3b5b-3da2-165d-6972f026857e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190226102404.29153-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 26/02/2019 10:23, Chris Wilson wrote:
> When a request has its priority changed, we traverse the graph of all of
> its signalers to raise their priorities to match (priority inheritance).
> If the request has already started executing its payload, we know that
> all of its signalers must have signaled and we do not need to process
> our list of signalers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> index 8bc042551692..38efefd22dce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ node_to_request(const struct i915_sched_node *node)
> return container_of(node, const struct i915_request, sched);
> }
>
> +static inline bool node_started(const struct i915_sched_node *node)
> +{
> + return i915_request_started(node_to_request(node));
> +}
> +
> static inline bool node_signaled(const struct i915_sched_node *node)
> {
> return i915_request_completed(node_to_request(node));
> @@ -301,6 +306,10 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
> list_for_each_entry(dep, &dfs, dfs_link) {
> struct i915_sched_node *node = dep->signaler;
>
> + /* If we are already flying, we know we have no signalers */
> + if (node_started(node))
> + continue;
> +
> /*
> * Within an engine, there can be no cycle, but we may
> * refer to the same dependency chain multiple times
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-27 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-26 10:23 [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Skip scanning for signalers if we are already inflight Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 10:23 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/execlists: Suppress mere WAIT preemption Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 12:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-26 10:23 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/execlists: Suppress redundant preemption Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 13:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-01 11:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-01 11:36 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-01 15:07 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-01 15:14 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 10:23 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Make request allocation caches global Chris Wilson
2019-02-27 10:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-27 10:44 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-27 14:17 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-27 14:43 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 10:23 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Introduce i915_timeline.mutex Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 7:43 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-28 8:09 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 10:23 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Keep timeline HWSP allocated until idle across the system Chris Wilson
2019-02-27 10:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-27 10:51 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-27 11:15 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2019-02-27 14:20 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-26 10:24 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Compute the global scheduler caps Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 7:45 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-26 10:24 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Use HW semaphores for inter-engine synchronisation on gen8+ Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 10:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-26 10:24 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Prioritise non-busywait semaphore workloads Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 10:24 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/execlists: Skip direct submission if only lite-restore Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 13:20 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-01 10:22 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-01 10:27 ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 10:24 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Use __ffs() in for_each_priolist for more compact code Chris Wilson
2019-02-28 7:42 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-26 10:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Skip scanning for signalers if we are already inflight Patchwork
2019-02-26 11:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Skip scanning for signalers if we are already inflight (rev2) Patchwork
2019-02-26 11:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-02-26 11:51 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-02-26 15:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-02-27 10:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2019-02-27 11:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Skip scanning for signalers if we are already inflight (rev3) Patchwork
2019-02-27 11:42 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-02-27 12:03 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-02-27 13:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c203d3fa-3b5b-3da2-165d-6972f026857e@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox